Page 5 of 47 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 464
  1. #41
    Player
    Gemina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Dravania
    Posts
    5,778
    Character
    Gemina Lunarian
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 100
    I think if anyone has found a way around the new housing rules, and is in clear violation of them, they should lose not only every single one of their plots, but also lose any ability to own one.

    Be strict SE, and make it so no one even dares to try. My $.02
    (8)

  2. #42
    Player Abelfei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    202
    Character
    Abel Fei
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Gemina View Post
    I think if anyone has found a way around the new housing rules, and is in clear violation of them, they should lose not only every single one of their plots, but also lose any ability to own one.

    Be strict SE, and make it so no one even dares to try. My $.02
    What ways are there around the rules? Everything these FC's have done is clearly within the rules.
    (3)

  3. #43
    Player
    Gemina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Dravania
    Posts
    5,778
    Character
    Gemina Lunarian
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Abelfei View Post
    What ways are there around the rules? Everything these FC's have done is clearly within the rules.
    I did not say anyone was in violation. Only if there are those in clear violation of them.

    In any case, it might be time to impose even further restrictions if FCs can do this. This "it's within the rules" doesn't pardon the selfish BS. Like not at all.
    (2)

  4. #44
    Player
    Sakuraluna's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,771
    Character
    Malfoy Fleurentine
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Freyt View Post


    Make no mistake, it's clearly against the rules, and the efforts made here are in clear violation of the rules. Just because you've circumvented the hard coded rules doesn't mean you haven't broken them.
    It is now. If you feel they are actively circumventing the current rules then report them and let the gm know what they are doing to make you feel that way. If they were around since before the current restrictions were placed, they were grandfathered in, so the new rules don’t apply to what they already had. Just what they can get in the future. If these are actively buying yet are characters on separate accounts then they are within their rights to do so, but if they’re making use of some loophole despite what SE has done to stop hoarding, then SE needs to know about it. I suspect though that it’s just someone or a group relocating what they already had.
    (0)


    ___Malfoy __/thefleurentine.tumblr.com
    because diamonds are forever, as is dust.
    ~ . S A R G A T A N A S . ~
    __________

  5. #45
    Player
    Bourne_Endeavor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    5,377
    Character
    Cassandra Solidor
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Gemina View Post
    I did not say anyone was in violation. Only if there are those in clear violation of them.

    In any case, it might be time to impose even further restrictions if FCs can do this. This "it's within the rules" doesn't pardon the selfish BS. Like not at all.
    But what classify as a violation? What stricter rules are you wanting to imply? Because, frankly, punishing to this extent sounds draconian.
    (3)

  6. #46
    Player
    HyoMinPark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Lavender Beds, Ward 13, Plot 41
    Posts
    7,339
    Character
    Hyomin Park
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 92
    Quote Originally Posted by Gemina View Post
    I did not say anyone was in violation. Only if there are those in clear violation of them.

    In any case, it might be time to impose even further restrictions if FCs can do this. This "it's within the rules" doesn't pardon the selfish BS. Like not at all.
    What kind of restrictions? And would they really matter? Because those who bought houses prior to these new restrictions you propose would just be grandfathered in, just like they were for the post-4.1 housing changes. As someone said earlier in this thread, it would end up punishing innocent players more than the people you would want SE to target.
    (2)
    Sage | Astrologian | Dancer

    마지막 날 널 찾아가면
    마지막 밤 기억하길

    Hyomin Park#0055

  7. #47
    Player
    Gemina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Dravania
    Posts
    5,778
    Character
    Gemina Lunarian
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by HyoMinPark View Post
    What kind of restrictions? And would they really matter? Because those who bought houses prior to these new restrictions you propose would just be grandfathered in, just like they were for the post-4.1 housing changes. As someone said earlier in this thread, it would end up punishing innocent players more than the people you would want SE to target.
    Like with the patch, I don't think anyone with current ownership should be affected if additional restrictions are placed. With the addition of the message books, I started going around wards to leave friendly messages to houses I liked, and I was astonished at the amount of homes I saw with less than 100k invested into the décor and not taking advantage of housing exclusive features such as gardening, chocobo stables, flower pots, etc. It's what has led to my abrasive PoV in this thread.

    Obviously, what people do with their homes is entirely up to them after they purchase, and people can buy to their hearts content so long as it is within the rules. And so long as housing is limited, the argument that limiting housing to even one per account regardless if FC or not will not fix the problem remains strong. Be that is it may, I can't keep down the desire to express my disgust with community selfishness.
    (0)

  8. #48
    Player
    Lambdafish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Ul-Dah
    Posts
    3,927
    Character
    Khuja'to Binbotaj
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Gemina View Post
    Be that is it may, I can't keep down the desire to express my disgust with community selfishness.
    You just went on a rant about people not investing money into their house, and you say that its the community that is selfish? My PoV as a homeowner with not much gil is that people can do what they like with their house, and you shouldn't judge at all. As for the housing availability problem, I feel that the housing demolition and recent restrictions are all that is needed for mid pop and low pop servers, however, I think that the devs should focus specifically on high pop servers with future housing improvements in order to cater to the greater number of players.
    (1)

  9. #49
    Player
    HyoMinPark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Lavender Beds, Ward 13, Plot 41
    Posts
    7,339
    Character
    Hyomin Park
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 92
    Quote Originally Posted by Gemina View Post
    Like with the patch, I don't think anyone with current ownership should be affected if additional restrictions are placed. With the addition of the message books, I started going around wards to leave friendly messages to houses I liked, and I was astonished at the amount of homes I saw with less than 100k invested into the décor and not taking advantage of housing exclusive features such as gardening, chocobo stables, flower pots, etc. It's what has led to my abrasive PoV in this thread.

    Obviously, what people do with their homes is entirely up to them after they purchase, and people can buy to their hearts content so long as it is within the rules. And so long as housing is limited, the argument that limiting housing to even one per account regardless if FC or not will not fix the problem remains strong. Be that is it may, I can't keep down the desire to express my disgust with community selfishness.
    Okay... but you still didn’t answer my question: what restrictions for housing are you insinuating/wanting SE to put in place? All you’ve done right now is tell me that you’re irritated people haven’t used their houses to your standards.
    (4)
    Sage | Astrologian | Dancer

    마지막 날 널 찾아가면
    마지막 밤 기억하길

    Hyomin Park#0055

  10. #50
    Player
    OliverB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    64
    Character
    Y'shtola Cat
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 90
    I've relocated about 10 of those houses to that specific ward when they doubled the amount of available wards. I've converted 3 of those houses to FC houses and since then, I've obtained 8 more FC houses for a total of 18 FC houses and 3 personal houses. Contrary to the popular belief, leveling up 18+ fcs takes ressources on top of the ongoing management. There's no circumventing the rules or any exploit. Anyone can load up 9 houses on the same account if they are willing to put in the effort.
    (11)

Page 5 of 47 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 ... LastLast