Selling Ultimate Weapon Ultima Is Apparently Not Against the ToS

[Iscah]

3.5 Naming Right. You may not use any name or other intellectual property belonging to Square Enix or any other third party in your use of the Game (for example, naming a character after a celebrity, company, product, or superhero).

That’s about what players can or can’t name their characters in the game (which is probably not so much enforced as there so Square-Enix can say “we said they weren’t allowed to do that” if the copyright owners complain).

The issue here is that you’re not supposed to post game screenshots on the forums that show other players’ names, regardless of what the name is, especially if it could be used for harassment or if you are accusing them of doing something wrong - however undeniable you think it is.

[MicahZerrshia]

It really only matters when gear matters and since gear doesn't matter in this game it's nothing to get too overly upset over. That shiney piece of gear they get will be out of date in a few weeks anyway. All this does is take away from the prestige of the win and if the people who can do it seemingly don't care about the prestige, why should anyone else?

As long as the top weapons for each patch don't hit the cash shop its really w/e imo.

[Nockvryca]

That’s about what players can or can’t name their characters in the game (which is probably not so much enforced as there so Square-Enix can say “we said they weren’t allowed to do that” if the copyright owners complain).

The issue here is that you’re not supposed to post game screenshots on the forums that show other players’ names, regardless of what the name is, especially if it could be used for harassment or if you are accusing them of doing something wrong - however undeniable you think it is.

Yes, I know that. I was making an entirely different point. If people want se to follow the tos very strictly, there will be alot of bans/warnings. I was just using that post because of the posters ign. Probably just want clear because of the quote, that the picture they included would be included in the quote.

[Nockvryca]

That's not stated in the terms of service nor is it stated in the forum's privacy policy.

And actually yes it is, section 3.5. http://support.na.square-enix.com/ru...2&tag=users_en

[Rubiss]

And actually yes it is, section 3.5. http://support.na.square-enix.com/ru...2&tag=users_en

No it's not. Did you even read that section?

[ko_]

3.5 Naming Right. You may not use any name or other intellectual property belonging to Square Enix or any other third party in your use of the Game (for example, naming a character after a celebrity, company, product, or superhero).
Doesn't mention anything about naming or shaming.. but I think the point is missed if I follow. Nock is mentioning this cause she may think it's wrong to ask for those people in the photo to be banned but not the OP for putting the names in the photo? I'm only guessing this cause she asked how strict do I want them to be. If I'm wrong let me know. But that's the vibe I'm getting.

[Nockvryca]

3.5 Naming Right. You may not use any name or other intellectual property belonging to Square Enix or any other third party in your use of the Game (for example, naming a character after a celebrity, company, product, or superhero).
Doesn't mention anything about naming or shaming.. but I think the point is missed if I follow. Nock is mentioning this cause she may think it's wrong to ask for those people in the photo to be banned but not the OP for putting the names in the photo? I'm only guessing this cause she asked how strict do I want them to be. If I'm wrong let me know. But that's the vibe I'm getting.

I wasn't referencing name and shame. Making an entirely different point. I used that original post because of the picture they included of their characters name, but the picture wasn't included when I quoted sadly. Basically, my point being how strict do you want se to be? If it isn't affecting your gameplay, I wouldn't worry about it imo.

[ko_]

I wasn't referencing name and shame. Making an entirely different point. I used that original post because of the picture they included of their characters name, but the picture wasn't included when I quoted sadly. Basically, my point being how strict do you want se to be? If it isn't affecting your gameplay, I wouldn't worry about it imo.

If it were up to me I'd ban them all honestly. Cause it does cheapen the value of the drops when you see people getting them buy paying for it. Even if it doesn't effect me it effects the content and other people. But I like to rule with an iron fist cause I like order. But that's just me.

[Nockvryca]

3.5 Naming Right. You may not use any name or other intellectual property belonging to Square Enix or any other third party in your use of the Game (for example, naming a character after a celebrity, company, product, or superhero).
Doesn't mention anything about naming or shaming.. but I think the point is missed if I follow. Nock is mentioning this cause she may think it's wrong to ask for those people in the photo to be banned but not the OP for putting the names in the photo? I'm only guessing this cause she asked how strict do I want them to be. If I'm wrong let me know. But that's the vibe I'm getting.

Actually I was trying to use your characters name as an example, the picture at the end of your post.

[ko_]

Actually I was trying to use your characters name as an example, the picture at the end of your post.

My opinion of the matter doesn't change, Iron fist rule if it were me.