I'm just going to chime in here - the whole point behind the post was to get others' perspectives on the topic. Yes, admittedly, I have believed that the only way for me personally to be a good player, I absolutely needed to have orange/purple parses and clear every bit of Savage content. By that definition alone, I have failed to be a good player. But I also play with a lot of others who either do not do Savage, or don't really care about parses, and I personally consider them good players. I have played with players who don't get out of grey parses, and I still consider them good players. The standards that I impose on myself are exclusive to me, and how I personally feel I should be to consider myself a good player - not others. But I wanted to know how others defined good players.

That's where I'm coming in and saying that there really are no wrong answers when it comes to stating your own personal definitions on what a good player is. It's a good topic to discuss, and I have read every reply. Everybody has their own standards. Figured it would be a good time to open a discussion about it. Really, the only time I consider someone as bad is if they are in lvl 70 content and don't have a basic understanding of their role. Or are just trolling.