Except...which direction should the world try to change in this case? There's the direction of artificially limiting clothing of sorts to only men or the direction of making everything considered unisex.
The nature of the changes that happen currently suggest that making everything wearable by anyone is the way to go though. And that kinda defeats the arguments here, rather than supporting them. At the same time, as much as I hate admitting it, women in pants do look more appealing than men in skirts ever will. It's something that requires wide-spread changes in culture that would require generations of directed molding of the younger folk. And for what purpose?
"I'm even willing to pay for them" is the defeatist attitude here. You are already paying the sub. You, me or anyone else should NOT have to pay for ANYTHING AT ALL anymore. If the subs don't give them enough then they should either increase the subs or make the game appeal to more gamers to increase their numbers. From what I heard though, the subs are far more than enough, but are entirely just sent to other games instead of left here.
As for the movements, there are a lot of movements to change the world in a lot of aspects...but most of those changes I'd literally abhor. So unless you'll bring up a specific one (or at least a specific ideology), I cannot really comment on it.
Hahaha. You really do not seem to know people all that well if that's what you think. Are there people that are scared for their well-being?! Certainly. There are places in the world where you could earn yourself a stab in the back for literally anything, let alone being a guy in a dress. But you would be surprised how powerful the notion of "what will the people/neighbors say!", where the backtalk is really the worst case scenario. And that is FAR more common. Since you know...People when their lives aren't threatened do tend to look for problems in the smaller things by instinct, just like by instinct they tend to try to explain everything in whatever way they can before even trying to research it. So there is a lot of "small issues" in the world that are exaggerated even to the point that completely ridiculous laws are made for something that should be a non-issue.
Sure, there probably will. But I'm afraid I am in the camp that would prefer games to hold onto a specific stylistic path and have multiple games each representing one or the other. Instead all we get are games that try to fit em all.
When can I get a fantasy game without pig outfits, bunny ears, bikini armors, halloween costumes, spring dresses and all that jazz that shouldn't come anywhere near combat even approaching the game? Probably never, because "one size fits them all" is prevalent...And size if something is for everyone it is for no one...we have issues like this where no one can win and everyone is shafted repeatedly.
Before talking about "gender expression" (which, I'm sorry, I know only three of...male, female or the rare hermaphrodite, since gender is a biological thing and all that stuff is just style preferences), where is the games expression? It becomes more and more diluted.
As I said before, I am in support of more glamours for both genders in a variety of styles. But there SHOULD be a point when something is just "too much" out there. Ironically, at the same time, I couldn't care less about humans tastes in real life. I can always look the other way if something really is unappealing to me. In a game though that's not possible, especially since part of the game is all about paying attention to other players.
*Sigh* There should never have been any bunny suit glamour for players in this game in the first place, male or female...