Alt characters and housing

[Sida]

Exploitation of transferring items aside (which is already possible with any sort of FC anyway) as they could well leave the furnishing right out of the alt rights. Just give alts automatically all the rights to "use" the house. Stables, vendors, bells, gardening and other such functional item use.

And teleportation. Since can't even friendlist teleport to my own house because no alts on friendlist.

[Rakiria]

The transfer of items in that manner is along the lines of the exploiting I referred to.

That us the only thing that can somewhat be seen as exploit, even though, honestly, if you already have a character on your account where you got these things you needed, why should you be prevented from having an easier time on an alt?

Item transfer is also the one thing that can't really be stopped. If you can give the thing to anyone in any kind of way, they can give it to your alt.

[Sida]

Item transfer is also the one thing that can't really be stopped. If you can give the thing to anyone in any kind of way, they can give it to your alt.

Don't even need FC now. Have both of your characters be tenant in someone else's house with furnishing right. That's one of the silly things now. One can have all their alts as tenants in same somene else's house, but not benefit in alt characters of their own house.

[LalaRu]

What exactly is the reason people want to share ownership of a house with their alts on the same account?

Just to say a couple, usage of perks as teleport to your house at discounted price, and using the NPCs there.

[YuyuZ]

Having your alts as tenants would go against their plan for putting less demand on housing by having friends share a house together. Adding a new group of owners(All owner account characters) on top of the tenant group for one house would put extra strain on their super fragile servers. They have to add new changes to their servers every patch while at the same time try to not add any unnecessary strain to it.

[LalaRu]

Just link house ownership to the account and not to the character, problem solved. No stress on servers no lists of owners no fancy stuff , everyone happy! (Ain't that simple I know, but well.. )

[Elamys]

Having your alts as tenants would go against their plan for putting less demand on housing by having friends share a house together. Adding a new group of owners(All owner account characters) on top of the tenant group for one house would put extra strain on their super fragile servers. They have to add new changes to their servers every patch while at the same time try to not add any unnecessary strain to it.

So just don't make alts take up a tenant slot and tie that house's ownership to the account? Why anyone would be against this I can't really fathom.

[SigmaOZ]

SE must compensate for the new housing limitations by allowing all characters under the same world and service account to "share" the house any of those characters owns, all of them must have full rights on the property with the exception of the relinquishing the land which is tied to the property owner!...

I doubt this could cause any more strain on the "fragile servers" because unlike tenants, alt characters cannot be logged in at the same time, only one character under the service account can be online at any time so problem solved!...

[Keridwyn]

I support my alts living in my house. I also support them getting rooms FC style. Solves the 'my alt doesn't have the same tastes as my main' issue to an extent.

[Brill_]

Can alts have an apartment if I already have a house?