could be a great news,but it gonna take years to see any of these ....
I think FFXIV is the best Final fantasy that I have played since XII.
People seem to forget that , in theory, you are playing a 4 year old game but with a large amount of "DLCs" periodically , a bit like what's happening with FFXV right now. FFXV is the same game that came out a year ago but still adding story lines new bosses new missions etc but KEEP the same formula. Eventually people will get bored of it.
If people want FFXIV to improve or change , the DEV team will have to RE CREATE from scratch a totally new FF"XIV" to make it feel it fresh and That could take years.
But remember you ARE playing an old game but with lots and lots of download stuff like patches and expansions etc.
I am up for a full system overhaul to bring FFXIV to what could be a FFXIV-2 with new system. I cannot ask for new bosses cause in every FF you follow certain formula that replicates in all of them.
I love this game to bits but I'm up for whatever. So I don't disagree with the op
Think your heavily overstating what XI did frankly, I enjoyed XI back in the day just like most that played it. But to say it was some kind of great example of game development is pretty sketchy. The release schedule was long, heavily drawn out, and slow. The game systems were rewarding mostly in regards to manipulative game elements, extremely low drop rates, and endless horizontal progress which kept events relevant for way longer then they probably should have been to compensate for the fact that they could not release content at a pace that would have been unsustainable for them back then without the manipulative game elements.
Am I trying to suggest that XIV is a perfect example either? No, it has it's own problems but too many people make XI content to sound grander then it was in reality
You see it as keeping events around longer than they should, I see it as horizontal progression that keeps it relevant throughout the years. I'm not expecting XIV to completely toss out the tiered endgame and treat it how XI did but the way XIV is handling new content is why this topic exists.Think your heavily overstating what XI did frankly, I enjoyed XI back in the day just like most that played it. But to say it was some kind of great example of game development is pretty sketchy. The release schedule was long, heavily drawn out, and slow. The game systems were rewarding mostly in regards to manipulative game elements, extremely low drop rates, and endless horizontal progress which kept events relevant for way longer then they probably should have been to compensate for the fact that they could not release content at a pace that would have been unsustainable for them back then without the manipulative game elements.
Am I trying to suggest that XIV is a perfect example either? No, it has it's own problems but too many people make XI content to sound grander then it was in reality
I've played XI for years (and still occasionally hop back in for a month) and I've played XIV since 1.0 launch. I prefer the way XI handled endgame by far.
Last edited by RethDaron; 01-11-2018 at 01:48 AM.
Another thing people don't say about XI is how little people actually got to play the content. During the entire span of Zilart and Promathia my LS had 2 King Behemoth kills vs dozens of Nidhogg kills. And even that was a minuscule amount, if we did Fafnir/Nidhogg in XI the same way we can do Nidhogg EX in XIV, everyone that wanted a Ridill would've gotten it even with that drop rate. If Dynamis entry cost and lockout was more like Diadem and we didn't lose XP/levels for wiping, we would've burned through that much faster too.
Besides the horizontal progression, part of what made XI content last was how much people couldn't play it.
that's not to say XIV can't use some Limbus, Assault, Salvage types of content with relevant rewards.
I can see it taking that type of time for older content, but with newer stuff still to come I think it wouldn't be as hard to do the harder versions of 4-man content. Similar to how they do EX trials, the majority of the time they come out at the same time as the Hard Mode. So, they will likely be adding mechanics, removing telegraphs, increasing damage/hp/defence, and whatever else they need to do to make it harder content.
Truth. XI lasted because you were forced to wait in order to get anything done. That X piece of gear was rare because the mob only spawn twice a week and you have 50 other people aiming to get it. Was it an achievement to get it? Or more of a relief that you no longer had to spend 4hrs a day twiddling your thumbs waiting on the spawn?Another thing people don't say about XI is how little people actually got to play the content. During the entire span of Zilart and Promathia my LS had 2 King Behemoth kills vs dozens of Nidhogg kills. And even that was a minuscule amount, if we did Fafnir/Nidhogg in XI the same way we can do Nidhogg EX in XIV, everyone that wanted a Ridill would've gotten it even with that drop rate. If Dynamis entry cost and lockout was more like Diadem and we didn't lose XP/levels for wiping, we would've burned through that much faster too.
Besides the horizontal progression, part of what made XI content last was how much people couldn't play it.
that's not to say XIV can't use some Limbus, Assault, Salvage types of content with relevant rewards.
One thing I would like them to do for the hard mode dungeons, is a moving DPS check(i.e. Wanderer's Palace Tonberry Stalkers). That would definitely add to the difficulty if they increase mob numbers/mechanics/etc.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.