Quote Originally Posted by LusterlessNova View Post
Hm... You make a good point. It means it would depend on how many houses a seller (or just multiple owner) has on how much of a burden it would be. Currently having a house is like having a gold bar. It doesn't age and has a solid value. That and the demand makes them attractive to hoard and sell. But if a system like this comes into effect, it would be more like iron. Prone to rust, with which I mean it has to be sold before it's upkeep costs exceed it's sell price. Judging by the current prices, 3 months for small houses, around 12 for middle, and up to 50 for large ones. No idea what/if this would affect large and middle ones, but at least small ones wouldn't be so attractive to trade with anymore, likely resulting in more small houses being available for some time.
Plus the sellers will just factor any of these repair/rent payments into their sale.