Request: Hempen Garb - Racial Unlock

[Ibkee]

Snip

While I take issue with much of this post, one glaring flaw, that I'm sure both sides can agree is misguided, is your assertion that everyone should have access to everything.
All races should have all Hempen of all races/genders
All races should have all racial starter gear of all races/genders
All jobs should have all AF
All characters should have all hairstyles, body customisation and add-ons.
Everyone should be the same.

Not only is this thinking a dangerous precedent for a game already lacking variety, but it clearly isn't the direction SE intend to take us. The options are limited by SE, not by us, whether they do that because your proposed changes would nerf the Fantasia moneytrain is conjecture on my part, but they have their reasons and the system works well enough that it's unlikely to change at this point.

Meanwhile, they keep coming out with new clothing options for all, underwear included. I'm sure the same will continue.

[Oscura]

While I take issue with much of this post, one glaring flaw, that I'm sure both sides can agree is misguided, is your assertion that everyone should have access to everything.
All races should have all Hempen of all races/genders
All races should have all racial starter gear of all races/genders
All jobs should have all AF
All characters should have all hairstyles, body customisation and add-ons.
Everyone should be the same.

Not only is this thinking a dangerous precedent for a game already lacking variety, but it clearly isn't the direction SE intend to take us. The options are limited by SE, not by us, whether they do that because your proposed changes would nerf the Fantasia moneytrain is conjecture on my part, but they have their reasons and the system works well enough that it's unlikely to change at this point.

Meanwhile, they keep coming out with new clothing options for all, underwear included. I'm sure the same will continue.

My assertion that everyone should have access to everything? Would you mind actually reading my post next time? My post specifically mentions that I do not understand how someone could oppose more options despite encouraging more options for things that align to it or are similar. Either that, or opposing something out of sheer spite for a group or particular racial choice and nothing more than that.

Quite literally, not even once, did I ever mention anywhere in my post, that everyone should have access to everything. It wasn't an even implication. I even specifically stated my personal stance towards this hempen thing is complete and total apathy. I was specifically addressing that opposing things for the sake of opposing them or opposing a group of people is just honestly a bit too pretentious for me. Please work on your reading comprehension.