It's NOT okay - and the WoL acknowledges that it's not okay - in particular, the DRK storyline deals very closely with the guilt involved in the necessary taking of a life. The keyword is "necessary"; when a soldier comes at you with intent to kill or be killed, one's options are limited.
One might argue that diplomacy should be attempted - and it can be assumed the diplomacy IS attempted, behind the scenes, where it won't interfere with enjoyable gameplay. Many things in this game are abbreviated (enemy camps are absurdly close to towns, a typical city only has dozens of people in it instead of thousands, and so on) in order to promote better gameplay, and it can be presumed that we are constantly looking through a lens of simplification. In reality, it would take days to cross the Sagolii desert, not minutes. Skirmishes would involve hundreds of soldiers, not dozens. The same goes for diplomacy; at best, the game will dabble with it on-screen; it's not going to prelude every skirmish with an attempt to talk them down first.
One theory that I was fond of is that a big difference between Ysayle's summon and Thordan's summon is that Thordan has no Echo - and, as seems to be the case elsewhere - anyone participating in a Summoning automatically becomes Tempered in the process. Ysayle, possessing the Echo, was fine. Thordan, on the other hand, basically Tempered himself. He became devoted to himself, and worshiped himself, and was going to go to any lengths to acquire the power to preserve himself. As with any Tempered individual, it was necessary to put him down, because given the opportunity he WOULD summon King Thordan again.
Ysayle, on the other hand... The analogy to Shiva being her suit of armor was a good one. While I'm sure the WoL disapproves of Ysayle's transformations, the WoL also trusts her to relinquish the form once the task is completed. As with the slaughter of opposing soldiers, it is a necessary evil. (How necessary it ACTUALLY is at times is debatable, given that Ysayle lost quickly against Ravana, whom we then proceeded to trounce; if we'd just gone first, there would have been no need for a summoning! Nevertheless, I think we can agree that between fighting Ravana as Ysayle and fighting Ravana as Shiva, the WoL made the sensible choice in allowing her to transform.)
However, throwing a wrench into my theory about Echo vs. non-Echo...
I honestly don't remember this being stated, but Moose is a very reliable source of Lore so I guess it happened. That said, Nabriales is probably knowledgeable about this kind of thing, and this would mean that Thordan DOES have the Echo. Whether it was granted to him by Hydaelyn, or some equivalent was bestowed upon him by the Ascians (thanks to the Garleans' Resonance, we now know that artificial Echo is a possibility, and it'd be not at all surprising to learn that the Ascians had such a trick up their sleeve) is not particularly relevant, but I think we can be confident that he did, indeed, have it. So, perhaps, he could have been talked down - and maybe we even tried, in a lengthy act of diplomacy that was too wretched and boring to show on-screen. XD
As for Moose's other contradictions, I don't think we can even remotely compare the Aether being bandied about during our encounter with Thordan to the ridiculous amounts involved with Bahamut, so it may simply be the case that the amount in Thordan's case wasn't enough to be lethal, like Louisoix's was. Or even particularly uncomfortable. And even if we were to insist that there were dangerous amounts of power, remember that Thordan had the Ultimate MacGuffin - Nidhogg's Eye - to explain away his ability to contain that power. As for the chicken-and-egg bit with Thordan and the Knights, this may be comparable to the way that Beastmen Temper people when there isn't actually a Primal summoned to help out. Thordan was in charge of the ritual that powered up his Ward, even without (yet) being a Primal himself. It was still "his power", as it were, and so the Knights were still loyal to him when he finally turned that power on himself.



Reply With Quote




