Its time to remove job-based glamour restrictions.

[Nhisso]

I like job identity. I like having something unique to me. It was really aggravating in WoW when they started making all the items that drop in raids the same model as the tier sets. Seeing what new tier I got for my priest was unexciting because, hey, the mage or warlock will be wearing the same gear too. I don't think there's anything wrong in having a few sets restricted to their jobs.

Now, for the crafting/gathering sets, I don't think they should stay specific to their jobs, just stay as DoL/DoH in general. But for DoW/M, yes, I think they should stay restricted.

You failed to address any of the arguments that were already made that made yours obsolete before you even posted.

[Elamys]

You failed to address any of the arguments that were already made that made yours obsolete before you even posted.

How? The arguments I saw being made were:

"We can already have tanks in bikinis" - my response to that was that the bikini gear was not already associated with a specific job.

"There is no job identity in the game/your job identity is your spells" - my response was that there are certain styles that are inherent to certain jobs throughout the FF series, and that identity isn't just what you are doing, but also how you appear doing it. Someone did point out the Genta healing pants; I don't personally think the presence of one piece of gear that breaks the norm is necessarily a reason to toss the whole thing out, and I imagine a big part of it is because of how tied to the other games Deltascape is.

"You already share so much of your gear with casters" - I don't personally like that, but I'm talking about artifact sets, not the rest of the stuff. Everything else should be unlocked.

If you're going to come in here telling people to read and use critical thinking, maybe you should read the other posts?

[Apl_Juice]

Snip.

We're talking about gear in general, not AF sets. I think anyone can agree that we can live without AF sets being glamour-able to anyone. I get it, they're iconic and all that. But everything else should be unrestricted.

[Elamys]

We're talking about gear in general, not AF sets. I think anyone can agree that we can live without AF sets being glamour-able to anyone. I get it, they're iconic and all that. But everything else should be unrestricted.

Yeah, that's what I'm trying to get at lol. I'm sorry if it wasn't clear ;.; I want more options! There's a really nice glam I want to use on my bard, but it would require the star velvet healing chest. That makes no sense to restrict for me.

[Aniya_Estlihn]

We're talking about gear in general, not AF sets.

Personally, I've been talking about gear in general as well as crafter and gatherer AF sets, as DoL/DoH sets are almost impossible to ever glamour because of how the system currently functions and some of those pieces are completely unique and have no equal matches to generic gear; like ALC having nice, flat skirt (without straps), and so on. Combat AF should stay locked, as I am sure most agree, but everything else should be free game.

[Apl_Juice]

Personally, I've been talking about gear in general as well as crafter and gatherer AF sets, as DoL/DoH sets are almost impossible to ever glamour because of how the system currently functions and some of those pieces are completely unique and have no equal matches to generic gear; like ALC having nice, flat skirt (without straps), and so on. Combat AF should stay locked, as I am sure most agree, but everything else should be free game.

Agreed 100%. I never get to see any of the Crafter/Gatherer AF sets, and this would actually tempt me to level those Classes if it means I can wear the Craft/Gather AFs on my combat jobs.