Quote Originally Posted by Serilda View Post
When you argue against 'unisex' you effectively argue in favour of the current status quo where female characters sometimes get given extra special 'feminine' gear and guys get...well, nothing, because the designers only seem to have time to do half the work these days and they all prefer cute catgirls.
I reject the idea that being against unisex gear (= gear worn by both in-game sexes that looks the same on both) is the same thing as being in favor of uneven amounts of glamour gear for the sexes. The latter does not follow from the former and you don't have to claim so if you have an actual good reason to think unisex gear is better. It's possible that someone might prefer sex-locked gear because its design more often matches one's cosmetic taste than unisex gear does. Unisex doesn't always look bad, but sometimes it does, and it's ok to find that wasteful and unfavorable if sex-locked gear always looks good in one's eyes.

I'm in favor of having an equal number of glamour gear items for both sexes (and also in favor of any means to reach that state). Sex-locked gear almost always matches my personal taste. I also like the gear that changes appearance based on the wearer's sex because it doesn't hurt inventory as much as separate items.






I'm against getting only new unisex gear (and hair) and no new sex-locked gear (and hair) because too often unisex doesn't match my taste. I'll leave out all the bland tin can armor and shapeless robes and just show the worst offender. Looks great on guys, but I would have wanted any female-only hairstyle in place of this because it would have looked better.