Dragoon Poll (Should DRG have a Wyvern?)

[Dragon]

1) Drg was the pet wyvern job in FFXI, we have identified with the jump, AF and class identity in general of the classical dragoon being the wyvern class. This was a step forwards even though it wasn't very well implemented in FFXI, they should improve it with FFXIV rather than going backwards.

Oh please. Just because it was done in FFXI means it should be done in XIV? Hmm, I could come up with plenty of things using that logic that you'd probably hate.

2) Don't mess with DRK. Drk should be that heavy DD with dark magic spells, not a pet job. How does it make sense to give DRK a wyvern? This is not where it "properly belongs".

Dragons are best related to demons (RE: Demonology) and sorcery (RE: magic), which is what Dark Knights are based around while Dragoon is at best an ANTI-DRAGON job if anything in relation to dragons.

The only ways of implementing a wyvern would be by either
a) Giving drg a wyvern. (which is where it belongs if implemented)
b) Making a new job, hopefully a second job for lancer. But then they would most likely not give them jump and drg AF, which is missing half the point of adding it in the first place for us who identified with how Drg was in FFXI.

Once again, Dragons are best and mainly related to Demons and Sorcery while Dragoon is an ANTI-DRAGON job at best with the polearm having renown symbolism of killing dragons.

Like I stated earlier, there are two full DD classes. Monk and Drg, why not separate them properly?
And if I understood it right from the interviews, Drg was getting the self combo system, why not make that for MNK? (seeing as there are more possible combos with 4 limbs than a lance).

They can separate them properly through other means. But again, it makes absolutely NO sense whatsoever to tie DRG/polearm to a dragon companion (which brings up something else~the way your ilk keeps referring to them as merely 'pets', just tells me you're more anti-dragon than those not wanting a dragon pet to begin with (which also is quite funny since wyverns are also known as faux dragons, that meaning they're only part or fake dragonkin altogether and thus not actual dragons); I want a dragon companion, NOT just a mere pet).

[Tonkra]

Once again, Dragons are best and mainly related to Demons and Sorcery while Dragoon is an ANTI-DRAGON job at best with the polearm having renown symbolism of killing dragons.

well and a beastmaster also can have a BEAST companion to his side because he tames them (he is focused in killing and taming beasts).. as well he is killing beasts.. the hunter in wow had his animal companion to his side and hunted animals as well...

Humans who ally with dogs and hunting animals.. well.. and why doesnt it makes sense that a dragoon allied with a small wyvern. a dragoon knows all about dragons. besides that small young wyvern wasnt that kind of big and cruel dragon? a dragoon understands how to kill a dragon, he knows all of his vulnerabilities... as well he could function as a "dragon whisperer" ... maybe he raised up a young wyvern on his own.. or tamed him.

what the heck... there could be many reasons why. so i dont think it makes no sense.
ever watched "Dragonheart" or else?