CNJ = WHM and THM = BLM

[Coglin]

This is like saying what is more colorful than black?

wha...wait.....huh.....?????

So are you denying that Scourge = water/stone/ice and Banich = fire/wind/lightening ?

or agreeing that I am correct?

[Inaaca]

wha...wait.....huh.....?????

So are you denying that Scourge = water/stone/ice and Banich = fire/wind/lightening ?

or agreeing that I am correct?

He's saying that mixing the elements together to make umbral and calling it more "elemental" is like mixing the colors together to make black and calling it more "colorful."

[Kinseykinz]

I hope they swap AOE styles between classes.

The circular AOE of Con in my opinion is better suited for nukes and on target spells

The cone AOE that targets everything between you and your selected target makes it easier to cover your allies.

-This

Amen...

[Coglin]

He's saying that mixing the elements together to make umbral and calling it more "elemental" is like mixing the colors together to make black and calling it more "colorful."

And I am saying, whats that got to do with anything ?

They are either elemental or not.

Its like he just either can't let it go and just accept that CON=WHM / THM=BLM......or he thinks the more he post argueing with those of us that it makes sense to, that we will either see it his way, or the devs will see it his way and change it.......Of those option, none of them make sense.

[Inaaca]

And I am saying, whats that got to do with anything ?

Um, because it's refuting your point? I think that alone makes it relevant, no?

[ellohwell]

Lol I knew they would do the stupid one! LOL

[Wynn]

Um, because it's refuting your point? I think that alone makes it relevant, no?

There is probably zero point in trying to explain it to him.

[Coglin]

Um, because it's refuting your point? I think that alone makes it relevant, no?

So your agreeing that Scourge and banish are elmental based or claiming they are not ?

[Coglin]

There is probably zero point in trying to explain it to him.

wai......t......wha.....t.......huh? so I need it explained to me? I thought I was the one who understood that CON=WHM.....THM=BLM...............and you are the one who is argueing and not accepting it.

What some one is not getting my friend is that everyone but a very select few like yourself understand CON=WHM.....THM=BLM......Yet your the one here argueing it........Thuth be told, its more likely that there is zero point trying to explain it to you.

I mean its not like its a debate...its factual that CON=WHM.....THM=BLM......so why do you keep debating the fact?

[Answa]

Lol I knew they would do the stupid one! LOL

Step away from my thread, troll queen.

@Coglin: You said that them being tri-elemental makes them more elemental, they're saying that mixing three colors together doesn't make something more colorful. Nobody has to agree if they're based on elements, because it's a given. They're just saying that your point is moot.

But please. There's no reason for debate. At all. It is what it is.