CNJ = WHM and THM = BLM

[Wynn]

Nukes are elemental?

Scourge = water/stone/ice

Banich = fire/wind/lightening

whats more elemetal then having 3 elements in 1?

This is like saying what is more colorful than black?

What gets me though is that you want to sit here and say 1 set of elemental spells is more BLM then all the WHM buffs and C-U-R-E - I - II - II.....C-U-R-A-G-A - I - II are to WHM......

Again, I say, you twist it and only notice what fits the view you desire to portray.

You're doing exactly what you say I am.

Even if we don't count higher tiers, currently CNJ has: Fire, Water, Aero, Stone, Thunder, Ice, Burn, Choke, Rasp, Drown, Frost, Shock, Flare, Freeze, Tornado, Quake, Burst, Flood, Shock Spikes, and Sleep.

The white mage spells: Cure, Curaga, Protect, Shell, Stoneskin, Paralyna, Silena, Poisona.

That's 8 WHM spells compared to 20 BLM spells. I'm not twisting anything, the facts are right there.

[Coglin]

This is like saying what is more colorful than black?

wha...wait.....huh.....?????

So are you denying that Scourge = water/stone/ice and Banich = fire/wind/lightening ?

or agreeing that I am correct?

[Inaaca]

wha...wait.....huh.....?????

So are you denying that Scourge = water/stone/ice and Banich = fire/wind/lightening ?

or agreeing that I am correct?

He's saying that mixing the elements together to make umbral and calling it more "elemental" is like mixing the colors together to make black and calling it more "colorful."

[Coglin]

He's saying that mixing the elements together to make umbral and calling it more "elemental" is like mixing the colors together to make black and calling it more "colorful."

And I am saying, whats that got to do with anything ?

They are either elemental or not.

Its like he just either can't let it go and just accept that CON=WHM / THM=BLM......or he thinks the more he post argueing with those of us that it makes sense to, that we will either see it his way, or the devs will see it his way and change it.......Of those option, none of them make sense.

[Inaaca]

And I am saying, whats that got to do with anything ?

Um, because it's refuting your point? I think that alone makes it relevant, no?

[Wynn]

Um, because it's refuting your point? I think that alone makes it relevant, no?

There is probably zero point in trying to explain it to him.

[Coglin]

There is probably zero point in trying to explain it to him.

wai......t......wha.....t.......huh? so I need it explained to me? I thought I was the one who understood that CON=WHM.....THM=BLM...............and you are the one who is argueing and not accepting it.

What some one is not getting my friend is that everyone but a very select few like yourself understand CON=WHM.....THM=BLM......Yet your the one here argueing it........Thuth be told, its more likely that there is zero point trying to explain it to you.

I mean its not like its a debate...its factual that CON=WHM.....THM=BLM......so why do you keep debating the fact?

[Coglin]

Um, because it's refuting your point? I think that alone makes it relevant, no?

So your agreeing that Scourge and banish are elmental based or claiming they are not ?

[Inaaca]

So your agreeing that Scourge and banish are elmental based or claiming they are not ?

Um... The fact that I made an analogy against it and that I just said that the analogy refuted your point... I thought it would be clear that, no, we don't agree.