Roulette Tweak Suggestion

[Rongway]

I keep hearing,

"I don't mind doing Sastasha if there's somebody who needs it, but we shouldn't end up in Sastasha if we're a complete party of high level characters."

The thing is, the roulette isn't there for complete parties of high level characters who want to queue DR:Leveling. It's there for the solo people who are queued up for specific dungeons hoping that people will queue up for DR:Leveling with an open spot in the party. So if you don't want to end up in Sastasha, queue for the specific level-appropriate dungeon your party wants to do.

[Maeka]

I keep hearing,

"I don't mind doing Sastasha if there's somebody who needs it, but we shouldn't end up in Sastasha if we're a complete party of high level characters."

The thing is, the roulette isn't there for complete parties of high level characters who want to queue DR:Leveling. It's there for the solo people who are queued up for specific dungeons hoping that people will queue up for DR:Leveling with an open spot in the party. So if you don't want to end up in Sastasha, queue for the specific level-appropriate dungeon your party wants to do.

Yeah, but you see, sometimes you Q up for Roulette and you just happen to get a full party of 70s, or 60+ or what-not.

When you DO get such a party, absolutely nobody benefits from getting Sastasha. I don't mind running Sastasha if it is of any actual benefit to at least one member of the group.

However, when the dungeon offers no tangible reward to anybody in the group except for the Roulette credit at the very end, then it seems like such a big waste of time when the thing COULD give us something higher.

And yes, I know the Roulette was originally made to help lowbies get clears. That's fine! That's awesome! But yet a lot of times, at least 8 out of 10 times, I end up in a dungeon that nobody needed.

EDIT: I would also like to ask a question: Would my suggestion actually hurt anyone? Would it take away any fun at all, if you were guaranteed to get a Dungeon within 5 levels of the lowest member of the group? Would that be a bad thing?