Botters has RUINED PvP :(

[Ayerinn]

I've been asking for no rewards on a loss for years now...

lol...that sounds like a great idea if you want PvP removed from the game due to 99.9% of the player base ignoring it completely...

[Alleo]

lol...that sounds like a great idea if you want PvP removed from the game due to 99.9% of the player base ignoring it completely...

Exactly. There is a reason why they put all the mounts, minions and other rewards behind PVP. People need an incentive to play it. PVP can be really frustrating, especially Frontline. Getting at least something out of it, even if you lose, makes it a bit better. If only winners will get something you will have the following situation: Big toxicity in chat because if you dont win, you just wasted your time. This will probably scare away any new people and probably lots of older ones. (There is a reason why we dont have chat in Feast anymore..) Also with three teams, even if you have a good team, there is still a quite big chance to lose. So you will punish the majority of the PVP players. This in turn makes the game mode utterly useless for most people.

If only a really small amount of people play this mode then SE might not even make something new for it. Thus in the end its even a loss for the hardcore pvp players. Having bots in this mode but at the same time more players playing it, might be better for SE than barely anyone playing it. Because it needs to be worth all the time and budget that is used for this.

[Shut]

If only a really small amount of people play this mode then SE might not even make something new for it. Thus in the end its even a loss for the hardcore pvp players. Having bots in this mode but at the same time more players playing it, might be better for SE than barely anyone playing it. Because it needs to be worth all the time and budget that is used for this.

Consideration for PvP in a nutshell. "Bah, that's just PvP, doesn't matter much right? Those peasans should be glad that SE throw a bone to them from time to time"
Boting is not a necessary evil, it's a cancer and a mmo killer. Crafters hate them for a good reason.


This particulary astonishing how people defend a broken rewarding system just because "muh pvp", while "horror stories from duty finder" posts get tons of reply, along with all the critics on jump potion players and PotD lvl'd players. More than ever, pvp doesn't teach you how to play your job.

If SE wants to bring PvE rewards in pve, idc because that doesn't change anything for me. But 1st, only in a system that actually reward people for their efforts (like it has already been said plenty of time, with healing/dmg done), and 2nd, it needs to bring rewards that are valuable in PvP, but both of those points need a deep rework, and that can take time. Even the most casual pvper has his wolf marks capped, which is only for glamour.

[TankHunter678]

I kinda wish they would try this:

Standardize the xp regardless of win or loss. Set personal performance level check points and attach a rating (Bronze/Silver/Gold) to those check points. The more high ratings you have the bigger an xp bonus you get at the end for yourself. That way trying gets you more xp then the guy who decided to AFK, but you wont be punished if your team loses because of circumstances beyond your control.

[Alleo]

Consideration for PvP in a nutshell. "Bah, that's just PvP, doesn't matter much right? Those peasans should be glad that SE throw a bone to them from time to time"
Boting is not a necessary evil, it's a cancer and a mmo killer. Crafters hate them for a good reason.

Funny how you read my post. No I am not defending bots itself, I am just saying that at the end content must be worth it for SE. They need time and money to create a new map for PVP, which is the reason why they try to put so many incentives behind it. This is also the reason why they banned the chat in feast, made it possible to go into it with a lvl30 job, put EXP behind it and made PVP easier. This was not done for the already playing hardcore PVP players, no this was done to have more people try it out and play it. Because people said that they wont play it for certain reasons. If SE did not care how many people would play it they would not have tried so many things to make it more popular. At the same time if they make the gained EXP way to low this would mean that barely anyone would try it out because its not worth it. And they simply can not make events like the Garo one all the time. Because that would mean that they put even more time and money behind PVP which would mean that it needs to be even more successful to make it worth it. Making it a good opportunity to level up your characters is one way to make a great incentive without putting much work into it. It just had the unfortunate effect that this also got the attention of AFK players and bots. So either SE sees this situation as the lesser evil because it would mean that people still would play PVP thus they got what they wanted or it means that they have to create a solution for this. But only giving something for the winning team is not a solution they probably want..because this would go against their aim to make PVP more popular. (I would love to be able to punish those AFKlers and botters way more easily.)

[KisaiTenshi]

It just had the unfortunate effect that this also got the attention of AFK players and bots. So either SE sees this situation as the lesser evil because it would mean that people still would play PVP thus they got what they wanted or it means that they have to create a solution for this. But only giving something for the winning team is not a solution they probably want..because this would go against their aim to make PVP more popular. (I would love to be able to punish those AFKlers and botters way more easily.)

This is because the design of the map doesn't encourage active play. I've played it a few times, and initially I was like "okay this is fun" but then I kept seeing three people bot on my team and kinda went... nope. I'll do it once for Khloe's book when it comes up, but it's absolutely not fun to play with or against bots.

Here's how I'd fix it, note that I'm not fond of PvP in general, but this feels like it would intentionally complicate things so that AFK and bot play would be detrimental without punishing PvP play itself.

a) Don't have safe zones. Give the player 5-20 seconds of being unable to be damaged after respawning them at the last claimed tower. If no tower claimed, drop them somewhere randomly and unpredictably.

b) Time spent dead counts against you. If more than 10% of the time is spent ko'd or inactive, no reward.

c) Remove mounts, remove sprint entirely. Create a PvP specific movement speed so that all players move at the same speed. Remove fall damage.

d) Put more entrophy into the map design. If there was ever a good business case for a procedurally generated landscape in FFXIV, this is it. This makes it hard or impossible for bots to be able to navigate because they can not use the existing game maps to predict where things will be.

[Pinkie_Pie]

a) Don't have safe zones. Give the player 5-20 seconds of being unable to be damaged after respawning them at the last claimed tower. If no tower claimed, drop them somewhere randomly and unpredictably.

b) Time spent dead counts against you. If more than 10% of the time is spent ko'd or inactive, no reward.

c) Remove mounts, remove sprint entirely. Create a PvP specific movement speed so that all players move at the same speed. Remove fall damage.

d) Put more entrophy into the map design. If there was ever a good business case for a procedurally generated landscape in FFXIV, this is it. This makes it hard or impossible for bots to be able to navigate because they can not use the existing game maps to predict where things will be.

a) Not even WoW, a big top dog game can add something like that, what about people who LIKE defending bases or flags, you gonna punish them too for playing their own way?

b) Then you'll punish the players or player if their team has no healer or they get pub stomped on, this will only further make them not even want to fight in fear of not getting anything.

c) What will that even do against bots, useless idea

d) No matter how you build the map and so on, bots will be bots and afkers will be afkers, they will run on any type of design.

[ThirdChild_ZKI]

Remove mounts, remove sprint entirely. Create a PvP specific movement speed so that all players move at the same speed. Remove fall damage.

With no disrespect, these are bad ideas that would do more harm than good. Though when I saw this:

note that I'm not fond of PvP in general

I can see why perhaps you might suggest that.

And let me just say despite the unpopularity of the game mode (among more serious PvPers) the Shatter map is tactically BEAUTIFUL. The better someone knows the map, the better they can literally use the environment against the enemy. If not for the objective actively discouraging active combat, as well as generally passive players, the Fields of Glory would be an excellent battlefield.

[Alleo]

Here's how I'd fix it, note that I'm not fond of PvP in general, but this feels like it would intentionally complicate things so that AFK and bot play would be detrimental without punishing PvP play itself.

a) Don't have safe zones. Give the player 5-20 seconds of being unable to be damaged after respawning them at the last claimed tower. If no tower claimed, drop them somewhere randomly and unpredictably.

b) Time spent dead counts against you. If more than 10% of the time is spent ko'd or inactive, no reward.

c) Remove mounts, remove sprint entirely. Create a PvP specific movement speed so that all players move at the same speed. Remove fall damage.

d) Put more entrophy into the map design. If there was ever a good business case for a procedurally generated landscape in FFXIV, this is it. This makes it hard or impossible for bots to be able to navigate because they can not use the existing game maps to predict where things will be.

a) Well the only thing this would do, is that a AFKler either just travels around the map (like a lot of them do per auto run) or just die and stand up again and again, while still giving points to the other team, which would make it even more difficult to the team that has those AFKler in it. So you would punish the whole team again.

b) I am fine if you have a certain amount of exp for just being in PVP (not everyone that is bad is someone that AFKs) and on top of that the people that are doing a certain amount of damage/heals gets some extra EXP on top of that. I am against things that are just punishments because you can have teams with only one healer and die a lot thanks to that but still try your best. Yet with your solution people would be punished for something which might be out of their hand. (I had more than enough runs where I stood next to a healer and died because somehow they did not heal me. Yet I always try my best till the end)

c) Then they should make the maps smaller otherwise traveling to crystals would be way to long and thus feels borings. Also fall damage is a nice way to kill enemy players. :P I love to kick them over the edge when I am healer and see them dieing thanks to the fall damage. (Also see no reason why this would help against botting?)

d) Instead of map design I really just wish that the next pvp frontline map is less PvE against some ice and more about PVP. I know that ice gives the most thus I try to get as much as possibly out of it, but I have the most fun in the map when everyone is waiting for the next spawn and kill each other. So more PVP against people and less PVE against some objects.

This is quite untrue. PvP had a small but dedicated, ACTIVE playerbase well before 4.0. It gave no XP, and it wasn't as simplified as it is now (and arguably more fun still). 3.5 and the Garo event overshadowed the fact that they made the biggest change the community had asked for for 2 years - the removal of GC restrictions, which in fact did far more to improve queues than the event did. And it STILL didn't give XP.

Let's stop spreading the wrongful idea that removing XP would kill PvP. If anything it'd bring some integrity back into the mode.

Someone said that we should take all rewards away from anyone but the winner team and this would imo be the death of PVP. I mean even if you lost you still got wolf marks, exp points for your pvp profil and stuff like that. Now lets take all of that away from the two teams that will lose it. Casual players only play PVP if there is a good incentive behind it (like Garo or ExP) so those would surely be gone. If you only have dedicated PVP players left you will still have two teams that will lose, even if all did their best. (Or have three winners with same points but thats probably really rare) How many of those players would truly keep playing if they did not even get wolf marks for their time?

Also even if there was a small active playerbase, it seems that its not enough for SE? I mean if they would be fine with only a small amount of people playing PVP, they would not try to do so much to get more players to play it. So it might be fine for the PVP players itself, but its SE that creates content and it was not fine for them. Otherwise they would not have done so much to make it easier for new players.

[ThirdChild_ZKI]

Also even if there was a small active playerbase, it seems that its not enough for SE? I mean if they would be fine with only a small amount of people playing PVP, they would not try to do so much to get more players to play it. So it might be fine for the PVP players itself, but its SE that creates content and it was not fine for them. Otherwise they would not have done so much to make it easier for new players.

I covered much of this in another thread in the PvP section. Wolf Marks aren't a very good example to use as before Garo it took quite a lot to get a body piece (12,700 vs the 4000 it takes now, and you didn't win 1000 for first place). You REALLY had to grind marks back then, and by the time the changes were made to both cost of gear and amounts awarded per 1st/2nd/3rd place, most frequent PvPers already had all they wanted with Wolf Marks. Removing wolf marks would hurt those who have yet to earn them, yes, which is why they wouldn't do that. Same with tomestones. But XP is different. You can get XP from every other content, and in some cases more. There was a time it didn't offer XP and it was both active, and there were far less players exploiting it for XP.

And if the state of PvP was not fine for them, why did it take 3 years to fix? Why was support so poor, communication with the playerbase that actually played it (as "not fine" as it was) practically non-existent, and rewards so far and few in between? Why did it take til 3.5 to implement the big change the community wanted, and even told them would improve queues (and it did, not the Garo event)? Why did they completely ignore the PvP community when they said "don't completely remove chat in the Feast; it'll cause entirely different problems" (and it did)?

PvP as it was before wasn't perfect, no, but it wasn't difficult. There was however, absolutely nothing done on SE's part to attempt to teach players. The community did that for themselves. To be fair, SE doesn't put out extreme trials or raid guides, players do that for themselves too. The difference was people who were interested in PvP and wanted to do well sought these guides out. They made the effort, and that's why they did well. That's still entirely possible with all the new systems in place, but I think there's far too many people that expect to lose, and thus don't try to learn or do well, even now with the "simpler" PvP systems. You get out what you put in, and if people don't want to learn, then they make it harder on themselves to win.

And let's not forget if "everyone gets a trophy" (XP in this case), most would see it pointless to TRY to win, thus afking and botting becomes rampant. Can you imagine if win or lose, you got drops from extreme trials? How many people would actually try to learn the fights and do well then? SE can continue to simplify and ease the difficulty of content, but at some point people have to actually TRY. Otherwise what's the point?