A consern about space efficieny since stormblood is not getting enough space increase

[SokiYagami]

Stop trying to do everything, and work with you're FC or LS, and then you will have much space. ^^ fixed!

(Oo and if someone say .. "Well I'm a solo player" ...well oo well get over it, you picked to be a solo player with no friends)

Erm... 3 words: untradable, binding (binded?), (I cannot stress this enough) convenience.

[Hamada]

Erm... 3 words: untradable, binding (binded?), (I cannot stress this enough) convenience.

Btw I think you are fine, and agree what ya said here:

My English proficiency isn't exactly great, but I believe the word you're looking for in this context is greed/greedy instead of selfish.

Firstly we (generally used for those agreeing with the OP) didn't claim that that this problem affect ALL the players nor is it game-breaking, more like being a major PITA. Next, we clearly state how this issue come about and suggested multiple logically feasible methods (which might not be easy to implement) to tackle said problem. Because you know, making a constructive discussion and stuff? Lastly, if you even bother to read through the proposed solutions, you should be able to noticed that the majority of them are actually ways to divert the inventory problem rather than outright increasing the slots only.

So are we greedy? Perhaps? But we did at least make it clear WHAT is the issue, HOW it came about, and WHAT might be the possible solution to deal with said issue.

And then you came along;



Just declaring the topic as a non-issue simply because you aren't affected by it. Yup, I call that being selfish. (Oh, I forgot to state my gratitude to the programming team for the increment of inventory space, it's probably not easy upgrading the structure to accommodate it.)

Sorry that one person acted in the way they did, stuff like that should be reported.

The list was there to give different ideas how to address the problem, since we do not know what they can to do address it, but it needs addressing.

[Brundlefly]

We been though this, Having all 60 does not mean anything, having all crafters at 60 does not mean you truly craft. Having BTN/MIN/FISH? at 60 does not mean you truly gather. Trying to do cul and fish alone is very taxing to space, let alone everything else on top of that. Your brd, the one shown on load stone, that is not a glam. The people that think there is no issues are the ones that do not make full use of the game. If they are going to give us the ability to be all jobs on one character, they need to give space for that. Just because you do not care about glams, or giving each job a different glam does not mean others follow the same play style.

It is not enough because we are basically getting the same thing we had at 50 but with a ton more jobs, the "extra space" they are given us is the bare minimum to remain functional. we NEED!!< read NEED! are armory to be double the amount of what we have for jobs esp when they are role locking the right side, making rings a more even pain then we have currently. Armory space we should be getting is 26x2= 52 slots, so 35 is a joke.

Do you the cutter you get trying to do 99 x 9 tokens for the extra nodes? saving x currency for x weeks because of limits and so on?

Again, you have no idea what I do and why I may not have glamoured what I have. I could explain it, but we'd probably get 3 more pages of nonsense like your comment. My BRD is my main, at the moment, but because I selected it in the forum profile and am currently logged out as BRD, doesn't mean that it definitely was my main.


This.

[Hamada]

I asked you if you knew what it was like, doing the things I said. This is why you do not think inventory is a problem, because you do not do those things. It is ok if you do not gather or fish or whatever. This is what this thread is for, to show SE how many do have problems because there is not enough room when you make full use of the game.

[Niwashi]

How many times do I have to say that you don't know what I do. And again (if you even made it this far), my original point was to show that while I welcome inventory increases, it still is easy to make room. Priorities and management.

"Priorities" is your own word. You just used it there. It means that you're making choices between what's the most important to you and what's not, and then choosing to forego whichever you regard as less important. So it's you yourself who keeps bragging about the fact that the reason you don't need more space is because you're not doing the things that would require it.

But different people have different priorities, and some take more space than others. If your personal interests in this game don't use a lot of inventory, then that's great for you. It means you're one of the lucky individuals who won't have much of an issue with it. But plenty of other players have different priorities than you do. For somebody whose priorities are collecting glamour and crafting, space is a major issue. Your "doesn't affect me personally, so nobody should care" attitude is a bit insulting in its own right (and that's even before you started insulting people directly).

[joannaluttrell]

Read this slowly:

No one is collecting junk. They are collecting items for glamour and for crafting. Useful things =/= junk.

[Brundlefly]

Read this slowly:

No one is collecting junk. They are collecting items for glamour and for crafting. Useful things =/= junk.

I'm pretty sure there was a comment up there talking about CUL and FSH which implies you are getting materials. There are many materials that can be junk. In fact, I collected many while fishing this past week. Which I proceeded to sell on the MB.

[joannaluttrell]

I'm pretty sure there was a comment up there talking about CUL and FSH which implies you are getting materials. There are many materials that can be junk. In fact, I collected many while fishing this past week. Which I proceeded to sell on the MB.

Indeed there are, but there are even more that AREN'T junk, which is the point.

[Brundlefly]

Indeed there are, but there are even more that AREN'T junk, which is the point.

Actually I proved my point long ago. Just read back.

[joannaluttrell]

Actually I proved my point long ago. Just read back.

I have read the whole thing, the only thing you have proven is your complete lack of ability to consider that maybe your way to play is not the only way.