We been though this, Having all 60 does not mean anything, having all crafters at 60 does not mean you truly craft. Having BTN/MIN/FISH? at 60 does not mean you truly gather. Trying to do cul and fish alone is very taxing to space, let alone everything else on top of that. Your brd, the one shown on load stone, that is not a glam. The people that think there is no issues are the ones that do not make full use of the game. If they are going to give us the ability to be all jobs on one character, they need to give space for that. Just because you do not care about glams, or giving each job a different glam does not mean others follow the same play style.
It is not enough because we are basically getting the same thing we had at 50 but with a ton more jobs, the "extra space" they are given us is the bare minimum to remain functional. we NEED!!< read NEED! are armory to be double the amount of what we have for jobs esp when they are role locking the right side, making rings a more even pain then we have currently. Armory space we should be getting is 26x2= 52 slots, so 35 is a joke. If they did not require us to hold onto 2 different weapons for jobs, because weird quests tell us to be on some job, but need trade them a weapon, I would back down from the job x 2 thing but with the game requires? yeah plus people like a few different sets to walk around in. This game requires a lot of space, and does not give us proper space to fit it. Say a game is needing you to have 50 spots as a requirement to get by , be it meds, or other things, while giving you 100 spots. This game gives you 1500 spots if you buy 8 retainers, but requires 2500, it is not enough room with how this game deals with galms, crafting, gathering and currency that takes space. So this game having 1500 spots is less room then the one giving you 100, because it only requires 50 to do everything you need to do. The point of this is to show why comparing raw number of spots is useless.
Do you the cutter you get trying to do 99 x 9 tokens for the extra nodes? saving x currency for x weeks because of limits and so on?
This.