Yoshi-P: "Paladin will receive alot of love"

[Drudwyn]

I don't know if I saw it wrong in the live letter...

But yoshi tried the big winged shield, commented, and moved to cancel then few secondds later put it back on....the gauge was empty and it's like no cd.....will be that on gcd 0.0

Wasn't that using GPose?

[Fernosaur]

I don't know if I saw it wrong in the live letter...

But yoshi tried the big winged shield, commented, and moved to cancel then few secondds later put it back on....the gauge was empty and it's like no cd.....will be that on gcd 0.0

People saw in the toolkit that it has a 120 secs CD (for now). I think Yoshi's game is just super hacked so he can showcase stuff. His character is also invincible to all damage. Either that or GPose, as Drudwyn said.

[bswpayton]

what about tank cool downs like are we suppose to only have rampart as our main cool down i have bloodbath and foresight on all three tanks

[Ultimatecalibur]

what about tank cool downs like are we suppose to only have rampart as our main cool down i have bloodbath and foresight on all three tanks

Cooldown suites will be different for all the tanks.

Paladin appears to be keeping Hallowed Ground, Sentinel, Bulwark and Sheltron. Passage of Arms is a new cooldown exclusive to the Paladin that can be used both when main tanking and off tanking. It should be easy to handle a once every 60s tankbuster with the new basic suite. Rampart, Convalescence, Awareness and possibly Anticipation will just be swapped in as needed depending on the content.

[Alise]

I want to know what ability will require shield oath gauge.

[Alise]

I have a feeling this pld wing ability is basically their dissipation, but maybe with even less use. We'll probably find some minor niche use of it but otherwise it will go largely ignored. Maybe the OT could make use of it. It's bad enough it seems to be a dps loss for the tank but if it makes dps jobs move that would be a major less of raid dps. It can't be required for mitigation because as said that would make pld required for the fight so when is it realistically going to be used?

Is it bad to have some fight that actually need Pld?
War always has their space as the best ST anyway. (which Pld will never good in that spot, so it is balance)

It was Pld that really had no spot in party before, being stolen by both DRK and WAR.

My opinion, the set up should be MT (Pld, DRK) and ST (WAR,DRK)

Make it so that DRK is at the middle, so everyone has their space in the party. Pld is better at MT, while War is better at ST.

[SpookyGhost]

Is it bad to have some fight that actually need Pld?

Yes.

War always has their space as the best ST anyway. (which Pld will never good in that spot, so it is balance)

WAR being required isn't a good thing either.

[Yorumi]

Is it bad to have some fight that actually need Pld?

Yes. With proper balance the choice of tank combo should come down to what people want to play. Warrior shouldn't have a guaranteed spot(and I play one mind you), nor drk, nor pld. When forming a raid party people should be saying "we need two tanks" not "we need a drk and war".

[Alise]

Yes. With proper balance the choice of tank combo should come down to what people want to play. Warrior shouldn't have a guaranteed spot(and I play one mind you), nor drk, nor pld. When forming a raid party people should be saying "we need two tanks" not "we need a drk and war".

The thing is that what happened before was "we need 2 of either DRK or WAR" -_-

[aleph_null]

The thing is that what happened before was "we need 2 of either DRK or WAR" -_-

Well, changing that to "we need 2 of either pld or war" doesn't really solve the issue.