Quote Originally Posted by Raikki View Post
Unfortunately that person doesn't quite know what they're talking about. It's possible that NTT could improve their internal routing in the future, but the location of the datacenters is set in stone now. The Colorado address you're seeing is a business address that NTT America's IP's are registered to, but is not where they're being used. This is abundantly clear if you simply look at their website:

http://www.us.ntt.com/en/services/da...center/us.html

They are not running a Colorado datacenter. They have facilities in California, Virginia, and Texas. No matter what conspiracies you want to entertain, even if you want to ignore the fact that the route terminates right after a clearly-labeled "sacramento, ca" hop, the fact is that the low pings northwest players are getting now would not even be possible if it were in Virginia or Texas no matter how good the routing was. You're being asked to believe the Earth might be flat.
Insulting people doesn't help your accuracy.

What I stated about routing tables is correct, it's a matter of fact that routing tables are dynamic by design and continue to optimize where possible. I made no statement about any specific data center location, deferring to better information should SE release it. NTT improving their internal routing is one thing, but routing into NTT can optimize regardless of what NTT do internally.