Forcing players to pay to keep housing is unfair.

[CosmicKirby]

I would just like to point out the irony of this statement on the Final Fantasy XIV forums in the context of the history of Final Fantasy XIV.

That is all.

And?

Doing what they did was most certainly a heavy risk. A risk companies tend to not pursue. An exception to a trend indicates there's a possibility but not necessarily a good enough chance to make a wise investment in.
It's still a valid point, that a drastic focus on a failing product could just result in not saving the situation. And in context to the line of discussion, would come at the cost of implementing features in this game that are the reason why most people play and enjoy the game.


Also that is not ironic, though humorously coincidental.
If I had said something like, "No company would ever support a failing product." Then that would be ironic.

[Zojha]

And?

Why are you asking for an "and" after the statement of "That's all."?

There is no "and". There's an "end". With E. That's the meaning of "That's all.". That is all there is. I understand you're really insecure and take anyone quoting you as a direct attack, but please, show some reading comprehension.

Sometimes a humorous comment is just a humorous comment.

[CosmicKirby]

Why are you asking for an "and" after the statement of "That's all."?

There is no "and". There's an "end". With E. That's the meaning of "That's all.". That is all there is. I understand you're really insecure and take anyone quoting you as a direct attack, but please, show some reading comprehension.

Sometimes a humorous comment is just a humorous comment.

Adding a 'that's all' is pretty typical of a parting shot you'd see in any passive aggressive conversation you'd have in the real world.
The only other posts I've responded to in this thread was one wherein they questioned if I read something in a condescending way and 'eyerolled'. (Their following post was far more neutral in decorum.) Both of which were obviously meant to be taken in a slightly antagonistic tone, likewise with the underlined part of your post.

If people hold opinions differing from mine, that's great. I legitimately enjoy having conversations like that, me simply responding to the comments isn't indicative of feeling attacked, even if there's clearly some intention within the post. This is entirely separate from having a conversation with a point.

I find it oddly humorous that you tell someone to not read into things like there was an intended insult, and then go on to insult them.