Votekick reloaded

[Miste]

Your previous posts were very much semantics, and you are aware demanding statistics from me doesn't make me any less right either?

If you can't prove a statement is "true" or "false" then naturally it would be "not proven" so it does make your statement "less" right. Although...less right sounds weird. I would say it makes your statement incorrect until proven otherwise, and you've yet to prove otherwise when asked (because you actually have no way to prove it).

By the same token, should you not be providing proof that my claims are false before making such a statement? Statistics? Research?

I am not the one claiming one region is better than the other. You are.

My claim is: no one can claim one region is better since none of us have all the information needed to claim that.

In simple terms: all regions are neutral because there is no factual statistical proof one is better than another.

This might have more credit had you not been hounding my previous posts in a dogged attempt to prove yourself right when I've already expressed I do not care.

This might have more credit had you stopped responding to me...you know if you don't care then why are you replying to me still?

PS. I'm not hounding you. If you don't want people to reply to things you say then don't say them in a public forum :/