Hence why I said for people to find an agreeable, justifiable means to their answers. Some from the first group are just tired of seeing insignificant whining over what could well be a compromised issue. Instead, I find disparaging remarks, insulting comments, mindless complaints and lack of a definite reason from some if the second group. Admittedly, some approach those problems with not the best arms, but there is an ethical side of things of which the second group is equally guilty of, if not more.

Truly though, some members of the first group would also consider the lasting effects of such a compromise. Would it slow down development, or limit the value of the game as they know it? Would such an outcry last well-past it's used by date with the new version, with a vast majority of players unwilling to give up their compromised price, and finding more insignificant reasons for such? The first grpup is equally logical in this aspect, if seen through another perspective.