Compromise: Just Charge $5 For Now. Once 2.0 is Out, Then Charge $12

[AmyRae]

Ignoring the economic side of things, it really is a matter of personal mentality. Some are of the opinion that version 2.0 is 50% complete, whereas the current version is near to acceptable launch level, as I also believe. We believe that, short of a few things which hinder our enjoyment which won't be fixed until 2.0, that the current game is playable for the full cost, as we mentally envision this game to not have any correlation with the next version in playable immersion. We enjoy what is being offered as a wholely game in itself, without thinking of the effect with the next version. Put into exaggeration, we believe the version 2.0 to be a completely new game to start off with, while the current game is whole to itself.

We then have the other group, which believe that we should pay only half or a compromised price for a game they feel is unfinished or not to the standard they expect. Different opinions are everywhere; what may seem better may be unpolished in another's eyes. (I believe Belial and Sierra made a point about this.) They also believe that with the advancement of the next version, what we do now is -kind of- obsolete and thus should not deserve the full price. In exaggeration, they believe the current game and the new vesion to be the same, with the latter being the true beginning of the game.

What I'm trying to get through here, is that the first group is well-served no matter the price of the game. It's not as though they would choose not to play if they had to pay less for the service.

The second group may represent a substantial number of players who won't pay full price, but who would pay a lower price. The reasons for this may vary greatly, but they generally revolve around the current state of the game, and the feeling it's not ready for prime time. If a lower price can generate more income by retaining a lot more people than what you would get by charging full price, the first group suffers no ill effects. On the contrary, they will benefit in the savings and participate in more active servers as a result.

It therefore seems illogical that the first group would want to fight the notion of the second group since they are not harmed in any way, no matter the results of the inquiry.

[Zanfire]

What I'm trying to get through here, is that the first group is well-served no matter the price of the game. It's not as though they would choose not to play if they had to play less for the service.

The second group may represent a substantial number of players who won't pay full price, but who would pay a lower price. The reasons for this may vary greatly, but they generally revolve around the current state of the game, and the feeling it's not ready for prime time. If a lower price can generate more income by retaining a lot more people than what you would get by charging full price, the first group suffers no ill effects. On the contrary, they will benefit in the savings and participate in more active servers as a result.

It therefore seems illogical that the first group would want to fight the notion of the second group since they are not harmed in any way, no matter the results of the inquiry.

its confusing as hell right? why would you be against it at all, unless your some pride stricken fan boy?

[whoopeeragon]

its confusing as hell right? why would you be against it at all, unless your some pride stricken fan boy?

And this is a great example of a post with no merit. Dear sir, I believe we are all human. Are we that we restricted that we cannot have differing opinions without derogatory labellings?

[stoned]

And this is a great example of a post with no merit. Dear sir, I believe we are all human. Are we that we restricted that we cannot have differing opinions without derogatory labellings?

fan boy. is not a bad thing and its another debate for another thread. we are all fanboys or we would not be playing the game. any1 that is not a fanboy quits a long time ago. there is no tother reason to play this game unless your a fan.

[TheVedis]

its confusing as hell right? why would you be against it at all, unless your some pride stricken fan boy?

actualy, its called people with common sense

lets face it, who WOULDNT want to pay less for something

i got to mcdonalds, would i rather pay 1 dollar or 2 dollars for a large fry

when i play an mmo, would i rather pay 5 dollars or 12 dollars for it


the facts are simple, EVERYONE would rather pay less for something when given the option


but common sense prevails and tell you that just because people want to pay less doesnt mean they should be able to pay less


this entire debate is moreso all based around this arguement, people want to pay less and they will give every reason they can think of to do so cuz at the end of the day they are probably gonna pay anyway, but to pay less would be better