Adire, it's not your opinions that make you come across as bigoted, but rather the extraordinarily rude and aggressive why you seem to feel the need to express them in. If you'd take a break from huffing and puffing, you'd notice that quite a few people have expressed dissenting opinions in a civil manner, and been treated civilly in return; the reason you're finding yourself getting attacked is because you yourself came into the topic sounding like you were trying to pick a fight.
Also, I don't care if Raubahn's kilt is historically accurate, by today's standards if someone wore it, it would be considered a miniskirt, therefore it should be just as uncomfortable and immersion-breaking as a guy in a regular skirt (which would not look significantly different anyway), given that your argument against that was based on modern standards. You can't give two opposing arguments for things that are functionally the same without expecting people to poke holes in them.
Or is it just the name 'skirt' or 'dress' that you're hung up on? Would it help your immersion if they just called the skirts 'kilts', and the dresses 'robes' when equipped on male characters? I don't see the point when those things are basically the same, but if the more masculine nomenclature would help to ease your discomfort, I'll happily support it.
Though for the record, I'm not especially keen on skirts on guys myself; it's just not my aesthetic most of the time (I find shorts much sexier AND more practical on both genders). But I do want those fishnets very badly, and I want the same number of glamour options as female characters get.
It is funny, though, that male characters actually have plenty of skirts to choose from, and most of the female-only items are NOT ACTUALLY SKIRTS, isn't it? I think the Spring set is the only one, in fact, since the High House set has a direct, male-only equivalent.