And then you have a choice. Do you stick with the healer, or the other person complaining. A vote kick can be initiated by either party. It then becomes the collective choice on what happens. If you are vote-kicked for being lazy then that is the choice the group made. If you are vote kicked for causing drama, then that, once again, is the choice the group made. You do not have 100% right to a group's time if they don't want you.
The OP makes an active choice to not damage. They expect others to put up with that. You play for fun, like others do. If your idea of fun conflicts with the overriding feeling of what "fun" is to the majority of your current group, then they have the right to remove you. Personally, I just eat the 30 minutes rather than cause drama in a group. Taking the active choice that I'm not willing to carry people who can't be bothered. Though people who come complaining that they were kicked because people didn't want them (though this thread was more about OP getting reported for 'allegedly' doing no damage, though attaching that they "told off" the other player as an afterthought, like that couldn't have had anything to do with it ) might want to self-reflect on why they were kicked.
Your idea of fun is less important than the group choice. If it doesn't match then being kicked is a possibility, and 'play style' has been shown to be an acceptable reason to remove someone, even in DF where we have people claiming that you can play however badly you like.
If you cause drama in DF, expect a kick (or people to leave)
If you play lazily, expect a kick (or people to leave)
There are people who are uncomfortable doing damage, and most can appreciate that. However, making it an active choice to do less than others, then complaining because people will not put up with it, even in DF, is spoilt. Expecting one group of players to use PF because they're unhappy with lazy players, but not the other group who are being lazy, is silly.


Reply With Quote

