Results -9 to 0 of 69

Threaded View

  1. 11-03-2016 05:38 PM #11
    Guesswhat
    Player
    Guesswhat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    558
    Character
    Aira Comet
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 100
    This may be a screwup on SE's part. It may just be they meant adjacent tiers; not 1-tier gap.

    If they truly wanted 1-tier-max-gap then the tiers allowed in 1 match have to be determined by the 1st person queuing in the pool not similar to the 1st person queuing.

    Example:
    personA silver starts q.
    personB silver joins q.
    personC gold joins q. <- Tiers decided. Only gold and silver may join.

    Is this what you're looking for? If not, and it's tier based, both unranked and silver are adjacent to bronze.

    Or perhaps it's ordered in a way that the 2nd lowest and 2nd highest tiers are adjacent based while the rest are tier based? That could explain SE's note; they're just pulling a "technical". Something like this (hope it makes sense):
    (1)
    Last edited by Guesswhat; 11-03-2016 at 09:13 PM. Reason: wrong
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »