It's a small gil sink to take money out of the economy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_sink
It's a small gil sink to take money out of the economy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_sink
A mentor stole my house, slapped me across the face, and raised my ping from 15 to 30. Literally unplayable.
#GetSelliBack2016
One persons profit margin or item worth varies from seller to seller. Some sellers items I just see as plain greed and I am not gonna follow suit, which then I will list using price history or what I think it's worth. End of the day if I can shift 20 items before making the next 20 and still gaining a profit then I am happy. Yes this can crash the market but that's when I stop making stuff and buy and relist items from the market.
Also with some items if they are not selling after a few days/week then yes the price is gonna get severely cut. It makes sense to cut your loses and recuperate the loss on the next 10 items that took up that slot. I do this over 5 retainers which each having sold 50-75% of their stock, which I will then refill by the end of the day.
I don't even get the point of this. There're two different sellers, each fairly placing two listings up of the same item for the same amount that the item tends to go for(as the history would easily tell you), and then this guy comes along, cuts it by 1/3, and with his next four listings, subsequently undercuts himself to the point of reducing his massive undercut by a further 50%. I kept checking on that guy and he wasn't competing with anyone and kept relisting for that same price while the items sold no more quickly than the history beforehand revealed.
I'd love to hear theories for the intentional market tanking you're showing. My pet theory is that they hope to drive the price even further down to allow a quick buy up of even cheaper units, with the plan being to pull his/her own auctions and then list around the 30k mark.
I don't even get the point of this. There're two different sellers, each fairly placing two listings up of the same item for the same amount that the item tends to go for(as the history would easily tell you), and then this guy comes along, cuts it by 1/3, and with his next four listings, subsequently undercuts himself to the point of reducing his massive undercut by a further 50%. I kept checking on that guy and he wasn't competing with anyone and kept relisting for that same price while the items sold no more quickly than the history beforehand revealed.
Insanity is a gradual process, don't rush it - Ford Prefect
What's worse is when I was selling a vendor bought item for moderate profit and someone starts selling for 1 gil.
I don't even get the point of this. There're two different sellers, each fairly placing two listings up of the same item for the same amount that the item tends to go for(as the history would easily tell you), and then this guy comes along, cuts it by 1/3, and with his next four listings, subsequently undercuts himself to the point of reducing his massive undercut by a further 50%. I kept checking on that guy and he wasn't competing with anyone and kept relisting for that same price while the items sold no more quickly than the history beforehand revealed.
Sounds like he's trying to find the price at which they would start selling more quickly. If they're still taking just as long, he hasn't gotten it low enough yet, and therefore undercuts himself.this guy comes along, cuts it by 1/3, and with his next four listings, subsequently undercuts himself to the point of reducing his massive undercut by a further 50%. I kept checking on that guy and he wasn't competing with anyone and kept relisting for that same price while the items sold no more quickly than the history beforehand revealed.
Thanks for the link & response very informative & constructive! Still makes me a little curious though, like how much is sitting in this virtual 'sink' on any given day, does anyone or gm's get some of this since gm's control it?because I don't think there is any way a npc would need this much to pay out to people that are selling to them.
Thank you for posting this! I don't get it either this is partly what I was talking about in my original post. Maybe he/she thinks the market will suddenly change if he/she keeps going that low.
I don't even get the point of this. There're two different sellers, each fairly placing two listings up of the same item for the same amount that the item tends to go for(as the history would easily tell you), and then this guy comes along, cuts it by 1/3, and with his next four listings, subsequently undercuts himself to the point of reducing his massive undercut by a further 50%. I kept checking on that guy and he wasn't competing with anyone and kept relisting for that same price while the items sold no more quickly than the history beforehand revealed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.