Results 1 to 10 of 100

Thread: Summoner revamp

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Cabalabob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,671
    Character
    Gunsa Cabalabob
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Neophyte View Post
    1. How could a SCH (which has same toolkit as SMN.. but without a pet, which deals about 30% of your dps as extra dps + damage oGCDs) out dps a SMN?
    He has literally nothing (except healing) to deal more damage then the SMN, even on 50.
    In 2.0 the only things SMN had over SCH was fester, a damage dealing pet and raging strikes. In sustained AoE situation, E.G dungeon speed runs, A.K.A the majority of content for 2.0, fester wasn't used, the pet's 90 potency auto attack was a drop in the bucket on those huge pulls and raging strikes could only be used once or twice.

    The constant 10% damage buff from cleric's stance outweighed all of these things and a SCH rarely had to leave cleric's stance because Eos could handle most of the healing and lustrate still worked at full potency while cleric stance was on. So both their rotations consisted of DoT a mob > bane spam > shadowflare > blizzard 2 until DoTs need to be reapplied.

    SMN might have beaten SCH dps on couple of occasions with raging strikes contagion DoTs but over the course of an entire dungeon run the SCH encDPS would be higher due to the extra sustained dps from cleric's stance.
    (2)
    Last edited by Cabalabob; 07-14-2016 at 11:21 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gilthas View Post
    The anonymity of the internet is what leads people to become jerks online.

    You could make a game where all you did was run through fields of flowers holding hands and you'd still get a guy telling you you're doing it wrong.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mcshiggs View Post
    Everyone knows you skip through fields of flowers holding hands, running noobs need to go back to WoW.

  2. #2
    Player
    Leigaon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    740
    Character
    Zara Diaspora
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Carpenter Lv 63
    Someone did make a post about the scaling of the summons to be more game friendly for the user and the environment. This was a big issue and I'm sure still is, though I do worry if a summon is too big, that could be an issue.

    On the other side, I do like how they feel the summons should remain these powerful entities, and it might knock them down a notch to have smaller versions of them running around.

    Though you're right, when I did the quests in 11 I felt more of a connection. I would have liked to see us try to summon Ifrit, Garuda, Ramuh etc..but show how we can be come either tempered or that our aether isn't enough to call them forth. That seems to have been forgotten.

    These egis, while I've gotten use to them, could be replaced with lesser summons of their elements. Such as Mateus or Belias (I was sort of annoyed when I saw him...) that require less aether for us to use. There is a lot that could be done but it also takes time, effort, money..and someone high up enough to care and say "Do it"

    I guess can only wait to see what 4.0 brings us and where our egi's go from there.
    (0)
    Last edited by Leigaon; 07-15-2016 at 12:11 AM.

  3. #3
    Player
    Neophyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    940
    Character
    Mim Silmaril
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    Summoner Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Cabalabob View Post
    In 2.0 the only things SMN had over SCH was fester, a damage dealing pet and raging strikes. In sustained AoE situation, E.G dungeon speed runs, A.K.A the majority of content for 2.0, fester wasn't used, the pet's 90 potency auto attack was a drop in the bucket on those huge pulls and raging strikes could only be used once or twice.

    The constant 10% damage buff from cleric's stance outweighed all of these things and a SCH rarely had to leave cleric's stance because Eos could handle most of the healing and lustrate still worked at full potency while cleric stance was on. So both their rotations consisted of DoT a mob > bane spam > shadowflare > blizzard 2 until DoTs need to be reapplied.

    SMN might have beaten SCH dps on couple of occasions with raging strikes contagion DoTs but over the course of an entire dungeon run the SCH e reapply/bane again as soon as Bio1 runs out). ncDPS would be higher due to the extra sustained dps from cleric's stance.
    Well, then was WHM the best dps of all classes. I didn't know you only meant overgeared (by tank, healer and dps) ez-pz dungeons, where contagion is not used/needed. Well then... maybe.

    On a 18s (0:00 @ 3rd GCD = Bio) fight against X enemies a SCH has (both save one AF-stack for later fight):

    [X *[(25+40+40+35+10) * 6 + 6*50 B2 + 10 Miasma2 hit)] + 1*150 ED] * 1,1
    =
    1,1*(X * 1210 + 150)
    =
    1331*X + 165 pot [@ 5 targets = 6820)


    SMN got:
    X *(25+40+40+35+10) * 6 + 6*50 B2 + 10 Miasma2 hit + 80 Aeroslash) + 1*300 Fester + 6*90 single target Egi
    =
    1290*X + 840 pot [@ 5 targets = 7290]


    And there's also Spour (1322*X+1056) or Rouse+Spour (1366*X+1358).. oh, and enkindle.

    If longer fight (= contagion) the SCH loses even more, since he has to redot, while SMN can do extra B2s.

    And of course Fester was used, since you can't use three banes within a minute (unless you reapply DoTs too soon or don't use contagion).


    Soooo... i don't believe you. :3

    I mean, nothing despite Enkindle-CD was changed (Bane-buff was for both Jobs) for SMN <=50.. so SCH schould still do more dps than any SMN in lvl 50 content or below? I don't think so.
    (1)
    Last edited by Neophyte; 07-15-2016 at 02:15 AM.