Quote Originally Posted by OliviaJ View Post
So, in a case like mine where I can only afford one sub but have two character (mine and my wife's) then only one of us should be able to decorate even though both were progressed enough and earned enough gil to support it? Even when in week three there are still some available? What's this shortage you are talking about? Oh, ridiculously high population server with players that are ripping each other off on two or three servers. I'll agree with one point. They should have figured out a way to add more wards to your server. I will never agree to changing the terms of the rules that were set for gameplay to satisfy overpopulated worlds.

Even though it's not possible I would love to see instanced housing in the worlds that are wishing all of this on the low pop servers. Leave us out of the fight.

Syrehn I like your opinion for the most part though. I might not agree with it all but I respect it if that's worth anything.
While I can see where you're coming from you might want to be careful about admitting to account sharing; it's against the TOS.

That being said your case would be a prime example of where, if they ever allowed property sharing between alts, you could both utilize 1 residence. You could divide the decorating up depending on the size of lot purchased. Maybe each take a floor?

The issue with instanced housing is that instances still require SE to save data so it wouldn't necessarily solve the problem the way people think. It essentially equal's out to "more wards" anyway since it's all about their data storage architecture.