Suggestion for 3.3 housing and alts

[Rawrz]

If your fc is so small as to not have 4 members (That's 3 members, not even enough to sign the FC documents, )bthen you should be sharing a personal house. Doing this sort of thing would limit most hardcore players from expanding past 1 personal, 1 FC. Not completely, but would exponentially slow them down.

I'm not completely serious about this, since the real issue is house flipping, but eventually personal use FCs might need addressed.

[worldofneil]

If your fc is so small as to not have 4 members (That's 3 members, not even enough to sign the FC documents, )bthen you should be sharing a personal house.

My FC was formed nearly 3 years ago by a group of friends from outside the game and we have 14 members. But over time most of our members have stopped playing and although some of them come back briefly from time to time, right now we only have 3 members who regularly play, and at this exact moment in the quiet period before 3.3 we only have 1 active player, me. We have no interest in recruiting new people as this is a group of friends from outside the game that as mentioned above do occasionally come back at times.

We bought the FC house back whenever it was they made subdivisions (2.3?), but by your logic just because our current member count is < 4 we should give up the house? Sorry, but that's not happening.

[MomomiMomi]

If your fc is so small as to not have 4 members (That's 3 members, not even enough to sign the FC documents, )bthen you should be sharing a personal house. Doing this sort of thing would limit most hardcore players from expanding past 1 personal, 1 FC. Not completely, but would exponentially slow them down.

I'm not completely serious about this, since the real issue is house flipping, but eventually personal use FCs might need addressed.

Uhh... how is them sharing a personal house of any benefit to anyone over them using an FC house?

[MomomiMomi]

Ah, I get you. I prefer small FCs so I don't agree.