Request: Remove iLVL requirement for undersized party or pre-made groups

[Lemuria]

The item level is there for a reason. You don't have to respect that reason, but I'm in agreement with Rayn here. It would be way too open to abuse if it was removed. The ilvl requirement isn't perfect as it stands, but just because something isn't a cast-iron defense against abuse, doesn't mean we should have no defense at all.

[CuteWhisper]

The item level is there for a reason. You don't have to respect that reason, but I'm in agreement with Rayn here. It would be way too open to abuse if it was removed. The ilvl requirement isn't perfect as it stands, but just because something isn't a cast-iron defense against abuse, doesn't mean we should have no defense at all.

Im also with Rayn here sorry OP but im against removing iLvl for reasons they both mentionned

[Xavikon]

Im also with Rayn here sorry OP but im against removing iLvl for reasons they both mentionned

I'm not sure either of you are fully understanding how the RMT generation process works(maybe you do, but it seems like your arguments indicate otherwise). RMT character levelers and/or farmers would likely NEVER use this feature due to the inefficiencies introduced.
It's possible I don't feel the pain of RMT as much on the JP realms as you guys do on the NA realms. Could very well be my opinion is less influenced by how it might affect RMT and more on how it affects the player base directly.

[MeiUshu]

Im also with Rayn here sorry OP but im against removing iLvl for reasons they both mentionned

same for me. I agree with him totally