Cleric stance needs change just for melding sake as healer

[winsock]

...wall of text trying to justify your misquote...

This is not me implying anything. If you need a wall of text to explain an implication, its a good indication you've interpreted something incorrectly.

I've said directly that "healers need accuracy" but am in no way trying to suggest that the game forces you into it. 'need' is not synonymous with 'force'.

Example:
I need to use the restroom
Someone forced me to use the restroom
^ very different things lol

I have no qualm about Cleric Stance's conversion because to me I see it as a tool for story progression and leveling. How it's used outside that context is also a conscious choice of the players (much like Accuracy vs Healing stats)and I will continue to see it as that.

Could you elaborate on that because accuracy during the leveling process isnt really much an issue either. Why is it okay have little to no accuracy/int issues while leveling, then create the need for accuracy but not int once you've leveled?

I never said anything to this effect. Please quote where I may have said or implied this.

I am on the side of giving healers an acc bonus

===
You argued, quote:
Basically, what you're implying is

Capable of only performing your Primary Function > Choice between 2 Functions
===

I am asking for clarification on how giving healers an acc bonus would in any way make healers "capabable of only performing [their] primary function".

I believed we might not be viewing this segment of the discussion in the same context, so I wanted to give you the opportunity to elaborate in an attempt to avoid making knee-jerking assumptions about your stance.

[EDIT] I am personally against having a free accuracy boost of any capacity on Cleric Stance and would rather see S-E reduce the accuracy requirements for casual content only.

To be clear, can we assume 'causal content' includes expert roulette?

"1 choice > 2 choices which I vehemently disagree with."
Using your own words, you strongly/intensely disagree with this.

If you truely feel so strongly about it, why do you support changes to causal content?