Quote Originally Posted by Galgarion View Post
That's not fair. There is a world of difference between a strength tank who knew what he was doing, and a copy and paster who assumed he was good just because he wore strength gear. As a healer, you probably know the difference between the two waaaaaay better than myself since you're the one who has to cast raise when it all goes horribly wrong.
I sort of disagree with this. No matter how good the tank may be, they're still going to be 'squishier' than a tank staying in their tank stance. I don't completely agree with Choco either but in certain situations it's a flat out hinderance having your tanks taking more damage.

A2S being a great example; when you're making your Scholar have to heal you because you decided to go DPS stance, you're bringing this false sense of justification on adding DPS. In reality all you did was add a bit of DPS for yourself while rendering the Scholar unable to apply DoTs and contribute 1000+ DPS.

I acknowledge that it was necessary for tanks to go full STR accs and play around with DPS stances to make DPS checks, but they did it to the extent that it became the healer's responsibility to cover for their mistakes. Along with holding aggro, people often forget damage mitigation should be a priority before DPS for tanks too. I can't count the amount of times I've had to turn off cleric because a tank wants to add to their numbers in a more selfish manner than actually wanting the most DPS output for the group.