Not a problem, I was responding to those implying (edit) you paid for the furnishing, which isn't the case, as soon as they say "bonus".
It seems nit picky, but it is an important distinction.
Clarification:
Implying the thing paid for was the "furnishing", continues then to imply you are being ripped off.
As a request/demand for change, it will never gain traction in that context. You can't argue you paid for a product when that wasn't the product being sold to begin with, that makes no sense either.



Reply With Quote

