Honestly things should be unisex, barring that I would settle for a male and female version of every set, or some sort of corresponding outfit (something that Guild Wars 2 did well, to a degree).
It was until people threw up a big stink about it being locked to males, if I recall. It's been a while. >.>
Last edited by KaijinRhada; 11-13-2015 at 07:44 PM.
You would not get anything out of that. It would not get you another glamour. These kinds of comments shows you people aren't actually interested in getting more glamours for male characters. You just want to take away glamours from female characters.
Last edited by Ariane; 11-13-2015 at 09:23 PM.
No. I just don't know why bunny outfit is female only while setzer, that is something c/c from a guy, is unisex. In that logic, -SE logic-, Setzer should be male only or bunny set unisex.
I don't want to take away anything I just don't understand SE logic.
Last edited by Khyan; 11-13-2015 at 09:49 PM.
Oh come on now, you're taking a single individual comment and acting like its the only variation of this argument, completely ignoring pretty much every other comment in this thread that says nothing of the sort.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.