Things need to explain: Bunny Ears

[Eul]

EDIT: Before you guys post, any comment beside "Bunny Ears" can go here: http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...department-yay

I need explanation by Dev and Community Rep. Since you guys promised "male will get gender-balance gear" from the Gold Saucer section thread:

Greetings,

Currently there are many pieces of male equipment that can be altered to be worn by the female characters, but certain equipment specific to females cannot be adjusted for males due to the differences in the character models.

However, there is female-specific gear (such as the head and hand equipment) that can be modified to fit with male character models, so we'll consider those requests based on the feedback we've been receiving. Also, we plan on creating more exciting male-specific equipment in the future to help the balance of gender-specific gear.

Then WHY DID WE GET ANOTHER BUNNY SUIT FOR FEMALE?! (More specific: Bunny Ears)

[ElHeggunte]

Does it matter? There's a male-only outfit being added too if you're concerned with "balance".

[Eul]

Does it matter? There's a male-only outfit being added too if you're concerned with "balance".

Does it really balance when currently on Gold Saucer the NPC selling 2 "Bunny set for FEMALE" and 1 "Setzer set for UNISEX"?

[Khyan]

Does it really balance when currently on Gold Saucer the NPC selling 2 "Bunny set for FEMALE" and 1 "Setzer set for UNISEX"?

Setzer should be male only.

[KaijinRhada]

Honestly things should be unisex, barring that I would settle for a male and female version of every set, or some sort of corresponding outfit (something that Guild Wars 2 did well, to a degree).

Setzer should be male only.

It was until people threw up a big stink about it being locked to males, if I recall. It's been a while. >.>

[Khyan]

It was until people threw up a big stink about it being locked to males, if I recall. It's been a while. >.>

It's always been unisex.

[Ariane]

Setzer should be male only.

You would not get anything out of that. It would not get you another glamour. These kinds of comments shows you people aren't actually interested in getting more glamours for male characters. You just want to take away glamours from female characters.

[Khyan]

You would not get anything out of that. It would not get you another glamour. These kinds of comments shows you people aren't actually interested in getting more glamours for male characters. You just want to take away glamours from female characters.

No. I just don't know why bunny outfit is female only while setzer, that is something c/c from a guy, is unisex. In that logic, -SE logic-, Setzer should be male only or bunny set unisex.

I don't want to take away anything I just don't understand SE logic.

[SpiritMuse]

You would not get anything out of that. It would not get you another glamour. These kinds of comments shows you people aren't actually interested in getting more glamours for male characters. You just want to take away glamours from female characters.

Oh come on now, you're taking a single individual comment and acting like its the only variation of this argument, completely ignoring pretty much every other comment in this thread that says nothing of the sort.

[Serilda]

There are already topics about this; I think we need to keep giving feedback in the same topic if possible: http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...department-yay

(Otherwise we end up with a bunch of trolls rushing in to make fun of us all for daring to want to have fun in a game. The main topic already has counter arguments for all of that stuff and we know the community reps are watching it as they're responding to our comments.)

But yeah, completely agree.

Does it matter? There's a male-only outfit being added too if you're concerned with "balance".

There is also another female-only outfit being added to balance that "balance" so complaining about the continued lack of a bunny suit for guys is still valid. And it does matter, actually, to quite a lot of us.