Can square enix just put Str and Vit on fending gear?

[ShiloEET]

Where is the logic in that? It's like people want choice, yet when presented with a choice they want everything

Yes but the problem is that fending gear has become irrelevant. You can't play if you have all fending gear anymore. Now i personally don't care that this has to be done, however i just feel like if a tank wearing all fending gear is useless or irrelevant it means theres an issue to begin with.

[Felis]

Yes but the problem is that fending gear has become irrelevant. You can't play if you have all fending gear anymore. Now i personally don't care that this has to be done, however i just feel like if a tank wearing all fending gear is useless or irrelevant it means theres an issue to begin with.

You can have str on your vit gear in 3.2
Or Vit on your Str gear

[Inferiae]

You can have str on your vit gear in 3.2
Or Vit on your Str gear

Point is: if VIT is irrelevant, why would I meld VIT when I can meld Crit, for example?

[Azazua_azura]

You can have str on your vit gear in 3.2
Or Vit on your Str gear

their makinhg it so you can't penta meld 1 stat like full str on vit or full vit on str only the sloted parts canb have these stats after that they don't count.


@ thread

i agree with this depending the changes in 3.2 with the above i think a mix of both, just male fending gear tank only vs "all classes" tanks are the only role that rely on 2 stats. Str and Vit. They need to output dmg as well as intake dmg. other classes don't need this and rely on 1 stats to do their roll. Unless SE changes vit to be tank dmg modifier, then thats what it needed to happen.