
Originally Posted by
Kosmos992k
This will be my last reply in this thread, and I shall be blunt also.
The reality is that if a player who is terrible at their job lies about their ability when joining your PF group, then they deserve no tolerance for trying to obtain a carry by deception. If they can't pull their weight, the party leader is within their rights to kick the player from the group, and report them for harassment by lying in order to join the group. I don't know what the GMs would do, but certainly you can kick them, because it is YOUR party.
In Duty Finder, it's no one's and everyone's party, there is no expectation of ability, no lying about ability to get into a run, nothing like that at all. The Duty Finder is for players of all ability. In that environment, a parser by default becomes a weapon that can be used to exclude players who are either new or not as good as others might wish. That is a major change from the current environment in which the Duty Finder is a useful resource for new players, and others alike. Imposing a parser ultimately makes the resource designed to help new players and others a much less forgiving and tolerant place and effectively cuts off that avenue for players who need pick up groups.
You always frame this discussion with the thought that all these players out there are going to force you to carry them through content. The trouble is that in fact Duty Finder is expressly designed for players who can't get into a group, to run specific content. Duty Roulette is explicitly there to help less able or newer players through content so that they can progress as well. That is what Duty Finder is for. All of the DPS checks and specific performance demands and 'standards' of performance you or anyone wishes to impose on others can be done in PF groups or your own statics already without any repercussions on you.
If you make Duty Finder a competitive, and intolerant resource, you are effectively disenfranchising a lot of players new and old, and I think you will drive players from the game. You might say, that's fine because they were not good enough any way. It's not fine, at all. This game is accepting of players of all capability and everyone can enjoy the game and it's story. Duty Finder and Duty Roulette are part of that accessibility. If parsing was implemented as you advocate, I believe it would have an immediate effect, and change the game forever. That change would make it much less tolerant and accessible. I won't hazard a guess at how many players would be lost, but I would estimate it as a larger group than the end-game community.
It seems to me that the biggest issue here is that this game is designed and implemented in such a way that the player-base includes gamers of very different abilities. Those advocating parser use seem to me to disagree with this philosophy, and would happily see players of lesser skill either improve or get out. Suddenly an inclusive game becomes much more closed and exclusive. So much for altruism.