I don't have a house, but I am still opposed to this idea.
I don't have a house, but I am still opposed to this idea.


Why?
Obviously the conditions for housing being relinquished would have to be quite reasonable, but do you really think it's fair that plots remain unused for well over a year (a certain Large in Mist on Phoenix comes to mind...*cough*) take up a very limited resource that only like....<5% of the player base get to make use of? Probably an accurate %, even though FCs can own them there are absolutely tonnes of personally owned houses - which is another thing, having FC and individuals share the same resource. When the second wave of housing came around we were led to believe it would be so much more, but all we got was a flipped copy of the existing zones with individuals being able to snap them up too. After quite a long wait I should add.
A reasonable line would need to be drawn, but over a year? Come on, that's ridiculous. I don't care how much investment they put into it, if actually playing the game isn't an investment they want to make either then they don't have the right to indefinitely lock other players out who would actually use it.
Last edited by Aeliott; 08-14-2015 at 07:12 PM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



