Saying a skill is only useful for world firsts is completely ceding the point, it's junk. Although unintentional SE is not putting skills in the game just for world firsts and is not intentionally designing content to require specific jobs.
you forgot to metion that divine seal is only WHM ability. AST has ZERO cooldowns to increase healing potency.
Not really. Also, I'm talking more about ilvl here. If you need, like, Divine Seal to heal A4S at ilvl185-190, then you probably won't need it anymore at ilvl210. Your party will have higher defence, you will heal more because of the better stats on so on. What CDs can do, however, is help less skilled players that struggle even at higher ilvls (and I'm not saying I'm a pro or anything, I'm not, this is just common sense).
There are a LOT of skills that become useless once a certain ilvl is achieved...like Virus and E4E...or even Sacred Soil. Back in 2.55 you could just succor and your party would survive a Gigaflare for instance (ilvl130 of course). Also, SE is not unerring. As I already said, jobs were left behind in the past, Dragoons, Warriors and now Astrologians being the most famous examples. What really matters for most people is to find the most efficient way to deal with something, but we're derailing a little from the OP.
The OP also forget to mention that a White Mage's healing is heavily restricted upon the GCD system. Albeit that now we have Assize and Tetragrammaton, our bulk of our healing comes from GCD, whereas Scholar's healing is split between GCD, off-GCD and Fairy Support.
As mentioned by Yoshi-P himself though, the skill was intended for aetherflow stacks with a bonus to healing potency. I can agree it's currently not the greatest cooldown, but it doesn't warrant (not directed to you) having Divine Seal nerfed to "-1%" healing O_O
The OP was using the -1% to make a point. When you trade the fairy for 20% healing bonus you're at a net loss in healing power. So basically sch's level 60 cooldown accomplishes little more than nerfing their healing power slightly for 30 seconds. It's not a perfect 1 to 1 comparison but it's using something absurd(making divine seal nerf whm's healing power) to illustrate how absurd dissipation is.
I like how you just completey ignore the point of the ability, the AF stack.The OP was using the -1% to make a point. When you trade the fairy for 20% healing bonus you're at a net loss in healing power. So basically sch's level 60 cooldown accomplishes little more than nerfing their healing power slightly for 30 seconds. It's not a perfect 1 to 1 comparison but it's using something absurd(making divine seal nerf whm's healing power) to illustrate how absurd dissipation is.
Indeed it is not, but tbh I feel like SCH is incredibly powerful...maybe too powerful. Just having 1 skill like Dissipation that may or may not be useful depending on the content (in some content it is) doesn't make the job less powerful. SCH literally has NO weakness. Great shields, pretty good HPS, great DPS, unequaled MP management and still people are complaining about Dissipation, saying it's a disappointing lvl60 skill. Well now let me remind you that WHM lvl 50 skill is benediction, something that may or may not save your tank because you'll only use it when you f***ed up and its delay can really fail you. Also you can use it only twice in a fight and actually should not use it at all if you and your tanks know what you're doing.
Every job have a very situational skill, Dissipation is SCH's. I really doubt it will be buffed, SCH is already very good...and again, people are ignoring the AF stacks and the fact that the fairy can be summoned again after 30 seconds, which conveniently is generally the duration of downtime phases is raid.
SCHs are not supposed to have a big healing cooldown. By using Dissipation, you can get 3 AF stacks and blast 3 600 potency heals in 3 seconds. Losing the fairy is a minor issue, compared to what you get. It could be slightly buffed to 25%, but it's not a broken skill.
No thanks. Please do NOT nerf divine seal!
Thank you for the clarification! That makes more sense. I didn't follow the thought process, so I was quite confused.The OP was using the -1% to make a point. When you trade the fairy for 20% healing bonus you're at a net loss in healing power. So basically sch's level 60 cooldown accomplishes little more than nerfing their healing power slightly for 30 seconds. It's not a perfect 1 to 1 comparison but it's using something absurd(making divine seal nerf whm's healing power) to illustrate how absurd dissipation is.
In my opinion though, Scholar's only real weakness is sustained & on-demand (non CD restricted) AoE healing, which is what White Mages and Astrologians can do.Indeed it is not, but tbh I feel like SCH is incredibly powerful...maybe too powerful. Just having 1 skill like Dissipation that may or may not be useful depending on the content (in some content it is) doesn't make the job less powerful. SCH literally has NO weakness. Great shields, pretty good HPS, great DPS, unequaled MP management and still people are complaining about Dissipation, saying it's a disappointing lvl60 skill. Well now let me remind you that WHM lvl 50 skill is benediction, something that may or may not save your tank because you'll only use it when you f***ed up and its delay can really fail you. Also you can use it only twice in a fight and actually should not use it at all if you and your tanks know what you're doing.
Every job have a very situational skill, Dissipation is SCH's. I really doubt it will be buffed, SCH is already very good...and again, people are ignoring the AF stacks and the fact that the fairy can be summoned again after 30 seconds, which conveniently is generally the duration of downtime phases is raid.I don't have as much raid experience on Scholar as I do on Astrologians & White Mage, but yeah, Scholars are quite strong. Mana seems to be tying Scholars down in this patch than in 2.0, however.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.