Because a single DA + Power slash combo or w/e it is called will throw DRK far ahead in comparison to a PLD's RoH. So they only need to do it 1-3 times in comparison to PLD whom would have to continue to use RoH through out the entire fight.As above, the DRK loses more damage by doing his threat combo than the PLD does when he uses RoH instead of RA. The RA combo also generates more threat than the DRK's siphon combos (including Darkside and the extra damage that siphon's mana drain will give you). Circle of scorn also has a threat modifier.
I fail to see how a PLD in Sword Oath is any worse off on threat generation than a DRK with Grit off.


But the DRK loses so much more than the PLD doing a DA + Power slash combo. For a DRK, excess mana will be spent on DA + SE. The effect of this is to boost their siphon combo finisher from 280 (DL) to 400 (DA+SE). So 1 DA's worth of mana is worth about 120 potency.
By using the power slash combo, the DRK is not generating mana via siphon, which is 1/2 of a DA. So by using the PS combo, they're losing about 60 potency worth of damage. By buffing PS with DA, they're losing another 120 potency worth of damage. The PS combo is 650 total potency, while the DL potency is 680 total potency, another loss of 30 potency. So, by using DA + PS combo to secure threat, they are losing 210 (60+120+30) potency of damage that they would otherwise get if they were using their siphon combos. In addition, this is all under the effect of Darkside, so you have to multiply the effects by 115%, which means the loss is closer to 242 potency.
When a PLD does RoH instead of RA, he just loses 80 potency, or 88 potency if you include the average damage boost provided by FoF. This means that for every DA + PS combo the DRK does, they're losing a little less than 3x the potency of a PLD who uses RoH instead of RA.
If you're throwing out 3x RoH for every DRK's DA + Power slash combo, I think the PLD will come out ahead in terms of threat generated.

also power slash gets darkside damage bonus always and is 150/220/300 potency as opposed to paladin's 150/200/260 combo which only gets FoF bonus 33% of the time (and you have to sacrifice fitting in a second goring blade if you chose to open with it).
also circle of scron's aggro modifier combined with rage of halone (4400 + 900 = 5300) still can't match power slash dark arts + salted earth (6315 + 1207 = 7522 potency).
it's a pretty blatantly worse situation.


Sort of. You're only looking at that action alone and not the effects beyond that one combo. Sword Oath's extra potency keeps going while you're using RoH. DRK's mana regen goes negative while they're doing a PS combo, and it goes very heavily negative with DA + PS. For the DRK, this means losing out on damage from extra DA + SE later. For the PLD that does a RoH combo over a RA combo, they only lose the 80 potency up front. It doesn't cause any further loss of damage after the fact.also power slash gets darkside damage bonus always and is 150/220/300 potency as opposed to paladin's 150/200/260 combo which only gets FoF bonus 33% of the time (and you have to sacrifice fitting in a second goring blade if you chose to open with it).
also circle of scron's aggro modifier combined with rage of halone (4400 + 900 = 5300) still can't match power slash dark arts + salted earth (6315 + 1207 = 7522 potency).
it's a pretty blatantly worse situation.

ok seeing as how according to both your statements and your lodestone profile you haven't played paladin @ sixty, you clearly don't realize the fatal flaw with your argument: it's pretty much impossible to hold aggro in sword oats without spamming rage of halone a plethora of times per encounter.
dark knight can get away with doing just one or two dark arts power slash combos for the entire fight (i've healed dark knights, i've seen them do it with monks and dragoons in the party), as a paladin main tank and one who's healed multiple paladins i can tell you for a fact that it's incredibly difficult to hold aggro in sword oats without using rage of halone at least 5 times in a boss fight, if not more depending on how competent the DPS in my party is.
and i'm in full str accessories with a i180 weapon and a bit of alex stuff. and I can't hold aggro against good i170 DPS without halone spam if im in sword oats.


You don't have to play a PLD at 60 to know the potency of attacks.
I think you misunderstand my argument. What I'm saying is that if a PLD needs to do RoH 6 times and a DRK only needs to do DA + PS twice to hold agro outside of tank stance, then that's fair because they lose about the same amount of damage in both circumstances.
5 times isn't close. I pretty much to ride halone with raid lvl DPS or a competent DPSing war.


Do you guys really like to tank in dps stance for some reason?
The damage intake is noticeably higher. I do it for bosses that don't even really hit for anything, so that a single renew keeps me up (notably, ex roulette, a1), but otherwise it just isn't really worth the hassle.
All else being equal, unless the healer can just afk and heal you up, doing 20% more of your damage isn't really worth freeing up 20% more healer GCDs.
At 60 PLD I have no trouble in sword oath...because I RoH every 3 combos, because...I keep up the debuff. Do you guys really just ignore everything but dps here?
As for DRK, I typically open with 2xDA > PS while in grit, then turn it off and then am free to use mp rotation from then onwards.
Last edited by pandabearcat; 07-29-2015 at 12:12 PM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote


