Limit breaks should all do the same damage

[hallena]

All it does is allow Ranged to actually get to see theirs outside of some very specific circumstances[/I].

While also nerfing the living shit out of it for anything more than 2 targets. No thanks.
http://www.infinitelooper.com/?v=F5FWFKRR1K4&p=n
Here.

out of 13 Turns

12.
caster lb was viable in 1 to clip both snake
was used in 4 for everything
5 for snakes
viable in 7 for boss + adds
9 for dragon
10 for add
12 for bennu
13 for adds

caster lb have its use and in many case is flat out better than melee LB so lets not change how it work because you want to see flashy effect on your screen. Caster LB might be a bit more situational but its amazing at what it does.

the dominance of melee Limit Breaks in single targets.

There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with melee lb being better for single target and caster LB being better for aoe.

[Sylve]

-

Just so you know, the potency listed in my suggestion was for Machinists Ricochet, NOT the Limit Break. Total damage dealt would not change.
All that changes is that a group with no melee gets to use a melee equivalent Limit Break.

Was that clear enough for you? Do i need to bold, underline, italicize and max font every word individually for you to get it? I don't give a rats arse about the visual, All i care about is the numbers. Being able to see something other than the DRG/MNK/NIN LB in nearly all content would be nice, but for crying out loud, even 4 mans with 2 ranged are handicapped because the level 1/2 LB is nearly worthless on a single target, BUT ITS ALL THEY'VE GOT.

Do you understand now? CAN you understand whats being asked for?

[hallena]

snip

Deals 100 potency to primary target, then 300 potency split between all nearby targets.

SPLIT BETWEEN ALL TARGET
This right here is what make your suggestion shit.

Caster lb now : The more target the stronger it is. 2+ targets mean more damage than melee LB
Your suggestion : Same overall damage against one target or 4.
No thanks