Bard issue... dps needed for Bismarck EX?

[Xellos2099]

As for WM, if you had a good pre 3.0 rotation, there's not a moment during those fights when WM is needed and most likely not a moment where it is actually a dps gain over a good old rotation.

I have to disagree on it. Even if i follow my pre 3.0 rotation, it will still be a dps loss from before because of the barrage change. And i cannot think of a stronger attack with a fully buff barrage+ EA atm, which would be perfect to kill the carpase . I do turn off WM rigth after it through. I am wondering through, should i turn off wm right after EA hit or after Bismarck throw me back to the island.

[Snowaeth]

I have to disagree on it. Even if i follow my pre 3.0 rotation, it will still be a dps loss from before because of the barrage change. And i cannot think of a stronger attack with a fully buff barrage+ EA atm, which would be perfect to kill the carpase . I do turn off WM rigth after it through. I am wondering through, should i turn off wm right after EA hit or after Bismarck throw me back to the island.

You can disagree on that part with me, doesn't really matter when what you were saying is that the dragons didn't go down in time.
Meaning whatever you guys were doing on Bishmarks back was enough one way or the other.

I personally peak around the same with old opener or with WM opener on a dummy, but my rotation flows much smoother without WM, resulting in better dps in the long run and that's why I rather leave it off.
Also the old rotation doesn't get messed up by whatever little bit of movement that might have cancelled a cast or anything where the WM does. (Tornado/Puddle on Bismark)

As for when to turn off WM on his back, if you'r making that part of the dps check, then it doesn't really matter we already disagreed on WM usage and both of us are making that part of the dps check.