So, why isn't this a thing yet?

[Kaedan]

You're right, we're in an age where people with dumb opinions like yours are allowed to be typed on a keyboard.

It isn't pedophilia, dude. Pedophilia requires a real child. IE children's clothing, pictures, etc. It does not include pictures of animu girls and boys. We can go through this for another 10 pages, but your opinion is wrong on its most basic level.

No, you are wrong.

Being attracted to/having sexual urges towards children is pedophilia. It doesn't matter if it's a real child or if it's a good 3D render or if it's an anime character. It means that person suffers from pedophilia at some level.

The fact they don't act on it with real children has nothing to do with it. That is a separate issue called child molestation. THAT requires a real child. Pedophilia does not.

[Remilia_Nightfall]

That's not my "opinion", child pornography ("Virtual" or otherwise) isn't a good thing that's a fact, it's objectively morally wrong. Removing/Preventing things that are objectively morally wrong isn't a bad thing, in fact it should be welcome.

Too bad I was talking about your comments on the anime industry.

Is Lucky Star for pedophiles?



No, really, genuine question. Cause it's a pretty darn well made anime. Does finding Konata cute make me a pedophile?

Got an issue with people corrupting things? Blame the OP, you know, the person who finds Raya-O-Senna, a person with the physical appearance of a child, hot.

You really insist on that, huh. I guess it's your best argument against me. Carry on then, I don't believe you can support your views with it.

Being attracted to/having sexual urges towards children is pedophilia. It doesn't matter if it's a real child or if it's a good 3D render or if it's an anime character.

That is your opinion and your problem. Again, if your mind is unable to differentiate between those things, I don't see why others should be blamed for it.

[Kaze3434]

No, you are wrong.

Being attracted to/having sexual urges towards children is pedophilia. It doesn't matter if it's a real child or if it's a good 3D render or if it's an anime character. It means that person suffers from pedophilia at some level.

The fact they don't act on it with real children has nothing to do with it. That is a separate issue called child molestation. THAT requires a real child. Pedophilia does not.

you are right about the attraction, but does that include not real humans/people? i couldnt find the law on it,(in a rush to get to work soon) but digital is expressly excluded because it is not real humans.
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedic...com/Peadophile

[MichiKyou]

._. I find Lalafell cute, I'd love more 'cute' races like lalafell. But I don't want to ever see them in skimpy clothing. nope, never. I think to me, even Au Ra are pushing it close to the 'i'm uncomfortable' line.

Edit: Also, I think another seperation needs to be made. Flat chested woman - with smaller breasticles than mthe average woman is not considered pedophilia. Liking that is fine, but liking it because its on the body of a 'youthful' person whom appears undear the age of consent? Probably not a good idea.

[DragonFlyy]

And Lalas don't?

Lalafells are not children. They are in fact some of the raunchiest NPCs in the word. Go talk to the fishing starter NPC. Lalafell and he says "Fishing is like philandering, you never know what you are going to catch."
Quest for weaver I believe, you are sent around to ask people what the current color fashion is. A Lalafell replies "I don't care what the color is, as long as it's on my bedroom floor at the end of the night."

So no, Lalafell are not children.

[ValyrianBlood]

No it isn't. Get the righteous bull out of here. Show me a source that intrinsically says that clinically they're pedophile for looking at loli and shota.

With your logic, if you're 13 and have a girlfriend that's a year older than you, they're pedophile.

Do u even know the definition of the word???

Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger. As a medical diagnosis, specific criteria for the disorder extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years of age, but adolescents must be at least five years older than the prepubescent child for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia x

[Casper]

Edit: Also, I think another seperation needs to be made. Flat chested woman - with smaller breasticles than mthe average woman is not considered pedophilia. Liking that is fine, but liking it because its on the body of a 'youthful' person whom appears undear the age of consent? Probably not a good idea.

Probably not a good idea ? Do you actually hear yourself saying that ? It sounds EXACTLY like what one would say in a tyrannic state. "Honestly, this line of thinking is dangerous *wink wink* You could end up in a dark place *wink wink*"

i'm sorry this is ridiculous. As i said, if you want to blame someone, blame the combination of makeup + perfume + jewels + clothes + pr0n industries who ALL play on the sexualization of girls that are 18, but barely, and made to look younger. At this point 15-18 looking girl sexualisation is just mainstream and then coming and blaming a videogame to be responsible for something that is depicted in every street of every city of the western world is just... Well, no need to use the adjectives i guess.

Like seriously you are going to suspect someone that likes small breasts, no matter the reasons, to being a pedo ? Please do tell me what i am allowed to think and what i am not allowed to abide by your righteous view of the world.

Do u even know the definition of the word???

Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger. As a medical diagnosis, specific criteria for the disorder extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years of age, but adolescents must be at least five years older than the prepubescent child for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia x

Hey we can be multiple at playing this game. First of all, lot of images shown in here are NOT of kids younger than 11 -- the image of the miqo'te in front page is what ? 12 ? Definitely not 7 or 8. So according by the exact definition you gave, it would not be pedo even if she was a real little girl, right ?

But wait, there is more ! There is nothing here that says "that LOOKS like prepubescent children". Pedophilia is a predatory line of thinking in that the subject is attracted to children that are vulenerable -- it is not only a "looking" thing, it is also the psychological domination that come with that. So, yeah, according to this exact definition you gave, attraction to a 10yo looking girl that is actually 30 year old mentally, if you know that she is, is not pedophilia either.

On top of that, actually, we are speaking only of human children -- where do you draw the line with fantastical being like this ?

AND another point, it must be primary or exclusive. So someone attracted to mature woman with a side attraction for little girls would not be a pedophil either -- again, according to your very definition, since you want to go that route.

Really, according to the exact definition you gave, there is nothing related to pedophilia in the image of the OP, even seen in a sexual context, for numerous reasons.

[Remilia_Nightfall]

logic and reason

/thread.

By the way ValyrianBlood, since you state the "cut off point" is 13, it means that anything between 14 and 18 is not pedophilia, and that Wiki article confirms exactly this. It might be illegal in some countries, but it is not considered a pathological condition as age of consent (which is NOT legal age) is something that varies from country to country. So there you have it - thanks for providing us with that info.

Of course, this would be meaningful if we were talking about real people. Since we are not, this whole arguing is moot.

I also hereby declare that Raya-O-Senna looks older than 13 human years to me. Of course this is up to debate, but since she is not human or even real no one can prove anything. I also reiterate the fact that I find her hot. Sue me.

That is all.

[Casper]

I also hereby declare that Raya-O-Senna looks older than 13 human years to me. Of course this is up to debate, but since she is not human or even real no one can prove anything. I also reiterate the fact that I find her hot. Sue me.

Seriously i don't even get why they must try to prove whether you are deviant for thinking that when it would objectively me much easier to just prove that your taste in the matter are plain poor ;p

You wanna fight, bro? Raya-chan beats your Minfilia every day.

I shall not even need words to answer that.

[Remilia_Nightfall]

Seriously i don't even get why they must try to prove whether you are deviant for thinking that when it would objectively me much easier to just prove that your taste in the matter are plain poor ;p

You wanna fight, bro? Raya-chan beats your Minfilia every day.

I shall not even need words to answer that.

So you are judging the quality of a woman by her boob size? Do you know how sexist and wrong something like that is? You should learn to respect women.

...

Ok, I will stop. I think the discussion is over anyway. Thanks mods for allowing this to keep going for so long!