Results -9 to 0 of 568

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player
    Musashidon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,798
    Character
    Blackmage Vivi
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Samcaesar View Post
    If you want to look pretty, work with the glamour system to wear flowing dresses and the new belly dancer outfit into battle, please stop trying to tread of those who want semi-sensible armor for girls as an option though. Besides, you're arguing that your aesthetic wants are the only choice, some folks would like a different sense of aesthetics. You have glamour to wear pretty outfits, so leave the armor as armor ought to look for use who want a semi-sensible option.
    seriously this works both ways, there are plenty glamours for both sides.(more to come with 3.0 and onward)

    in the end the argument is pointless both sides have their said tastes.

    saying armor should always look practical and to use glamour to look sexy is like saying the exact opposite glamour should look sexy and and to wear armor to look practical. (like if we were arguing that glamours shouldn't look non sexy) )

    there should be both kinds for all kinds of gear.


    now this whole male vs female is down right pointless. it's about gear people like.

    people want to wear full armor instead of their boobs hanging out. just like some people want to wear armor where they are half naked.

    saying gear should look just one way or another is selfish all gear should be made differently some with more skin showing then others and others with less showing.
    (2)
    Last edited by Musashidon; 06-14-2015 at 07:01 PM.