Quote Originally Posted by Niwashi View Post
I don't think anyone (or at least not many) want the ability to look impractical removed. We just don't want to be forced into it by having it on AF gear. AF gear is supposed to define the look of the job we're playing. It's for use when we want that level of immersion, at least for our own characters. If other people don't want that immersion and would rather glamour their tank gear to look like a swimsuit, well, that's their business. But let people of either gender who play a dark knight and want to look like one be able to look like a dark knight. (And preferably, allow dragoons who want to to look like dragoons, without silly nonsensical holes in their armour, though it's a bit late for that.)
This a billion times over. AF is what is being discussed here, not the culling of provocative glamour options. Is it really so bad to just have the Job look like the job? I'm sure many will glamour the new dancer looking gear top with the rest of the outfit, that's fine no issue, it's no reason to lock female characters into cheerleader variants of AF .