3.0+ Midgardsormr Progression Thread

[bwa]

IMO the ideal would be to keep it like the previous thread, but allow multiple groups from an FC to post to the thread and track those kills. I don't think we should be counting multiple groups from the same FC as "server 2nd", "server 3rd", etc. for the reasons that I've listed above.

[Curia_Regis]

IMO the ideal would be to keep it like the previous thread, but allow multiple groups from an FC to post to the thread and track those kills. I don't think we should be counting multiple groups from the same FC as "server 2nd", "server 3rd", etc. for the reasons that I've listed above.

Alright, I'll work on the formatting and see what looks good.

[d4gz]

[Curia_Regis]

IMO the ideal would be to keep it like the previous thread, but allow multiple groups from an FC to post to the thread and track those kills. I don't think we should be counting multiple groups from the same FC as "server 2nd", "server 3rd", etc. for the reasons that I've listed above.

I've removed the requirement for only tracking so many kills, but I've broken each turn up into its own section, as well as a section for overall Alexander completion. I know sometimes groups start off slower and end up finishing before others or vice versa, so the list should reflect that. Each group will be listed in descending order based on kill date, and if there is an FC association it will be added.

I hope this both keeps things interesting and is something that people can agree upon.

[bwa]

I've removed the requirement for only tracking so many kills, but I've broken each turn up into its own section, as well as a section for overall Alexander completion. I know sometimes groups start off slower and end up finishing before others or vice versa, so the list should reflect that. Each group will be listed in descending order based on kill date, and if there is an FC association it will be added.

I hope this both keeps things interesting and is something that people can agree upon.

This is more or less what I wanted. One extra element that could be added: I don't think it would be difficult to implement something where you can bold first kills within-FC or italicize tertiary kills within-FC.