Quote Originally Posted by Vlady View Post
The general consensus in the game so far is white mages are way behind scholars in the power curve and usefulness. Considering having asked over 50 white mages on my server alone and 36 of them admit they go scholar for dungeons and feel that the scholar is more powerful then the white mage it is no wonder some people are worried Astrologian will become their new main in 3.0. White mage has only raw healing as its sticking point. Scholars have superior dps, mitigation cooldowns and stronger heals then white mage and were able to solo heal all content faster and in weaker gear then white mages.

SE will have no choice but to give white mage's stronger utility spells and dps when Astrologian numbers shoot up while white mages drop the same %. The only reason people seem to be confused at how weak the white mage truly is right now is because as other people have said it is a stronger combination to have white mage/scholar then double scholar with Galvanize shield not stacking with other scholar shields. If the were to ever get rid of that you would see 90% of all high end raids use scholars then.

Future isnt looking good for the gimp white mage ;(. Please buff them SE.

After an entire thread that you created over this where the only thing that happened was your opinion was debunked by the masses, I would have thought that you would get the point that you do not speak for the masses at all. This is not the general consensus.

People who can not use WHM to save their lives (or anyone elses) are the ones with this opinion.

And stop it with the sch shield stacking thing, they dont stack, therefore the entire argument about it is non existant. If whm could use stoneskin 2 in combat it would kill off the sch. That is how absurd your arguments are getting now.