Whm / Scholar - who is better

[Ghishlain]

Just look at the kittens, wouldja? Just look at the dang kittens.
Kittens don't care about the WHM vs SCH thing. You wanna know why? Because kittens!

>_< fdhskjfdshk *titan tableflip*
Why did this thread have to exist, again? We're back at square one, yet again.
*agitated*

Because people have an opinion but can't back it up with hard facts, that's why =p

Have more kittens!

Sigh. I don't really want to continue this nonsense but...

Anyone who thinks a SCH is leagues in head of a WHM doesn't really have a proper grasp of WHM.
DPS thing: This is completely false. A lot of groups prefer WHM over SCH for speed runs because of Holy. And you can use Bene while in Cleric Stance.

I don't know why people think SCH is better. =/ Or why people would think WHM is better. Both are good and they don't outshine each other in the long run.

You're best to ignore Vlady, he's pretty entrenched in his opinion on the whole thing. While I personally believe the SCH toolkit is indeed stronger than the WHM toolkit, the division isn't so grand in the current meta that WHM needs any obvious buffs. That will most certainly change in Heavensward because regardless of anything, one of the healers WILL be considered third tier.